2009
DOI: 10.1163/156853809789647040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet of Hydromedusa tectifera (Testudines-Chelidae) in a mountain stream of Córdoba province, Argentina

Abstract: The diet of Hydromedusa tectifera occurring in two mountain streams in the province of Córdoba is described through a comparative analysis of 154 individuals. Turtles were manually captured between August 2005 and August 2006 from streams at the localities of Tanti and Flor Serrana. Before being released, turtles were stomach-flushed, and sex and carapace length were recorded. The stomach contents were observed under stereomicroscope; prey items were identified and classified according to size and volume. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of Chelodina spp. and Hydromedusa spp., however, have established a much wider carnivorous dietary spectrum that includes small aquatic invertebrates (mostly insect larvae) and vertebrates [95][96][97][98]. A similarly broad, opportunistic food palate seems plausible for Sahonachelys mailakavava as well.…”
Section: Palaeoecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of Chelodina spp. and Hydromedusa spp., however, have established a much wider carnivorous dietary spectrum that includes small aquatic invertebrates (mostly insect larvae) and vertebrates [95][96][97][98]. A similarly broad, opportunistic food palate seems plausible for Sahonachelys mailakavava as well.…”
Section: Palaeoecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chi-square (3 x 2 comparison) test indicated no statistical difference between major diel period and the proportion of manatees with armored catfish (χ 2 = 4.634, df = 2, p = 0.0986). Willard, 1985;and Caiman latirostris;Borteiro et al, 2009), aquatic snakes (e.g., Helicops; Aguiar & Di-Beernardo, 2004), freshwater turtles (e.g., Hydromedusa tectifera; Bonino et al, 2009), the large catfishes Phractocephalus hemioliopterus and Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum and certain other predatory fishes (Nico & Taphorn, 1988;Bistoni et al, 1995;BarbarinoDuque & Winemiller, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para calcular la abundancia relativa durante los meses de estudio se consideró la captura mensual por unidad de esfuerzo (CPUE), determinada como el número total de los individuos capturados dividido entre el número de trasmallos colocados por las horas diarias que estuvieron abiertos (Lescano, Bonino & Leynaud, 2008;Zenteno, Barba, Bello & Ochoa, 2010). El cambio mensual de la abundancia relativa de la especie se determinó mediante la comparación del número de individuos capturados por el esfuerzo de captura mensual y se multiplicó por 100 (Lescano et al, 2008). Por otro lado para determinar si las variables ambientales tienen relación con el número de individuos capturados en la época seca y lluviosa, se midieron datos de profundidad del agua.…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified