The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-415849-8.00012-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diego Blood Group System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, matching against specific high‐immunogenic RBC antigens did not seem to protect against alloimmunisation to other (non‐matched, non‐linked) ‘weaker’ RBC antigens by a mechanism of epitope spreading as suggested by others. 11 Comparing the standard distribution of RBC antigen phenotypes among the Caucasian population 12 to the one in our extended matched study population, the probability for a c‐negative female to randomly receive a c‐positive RBC unit in non‐matching conditions was 80%, whereas in matching conditions it was 6·5%. Thus, the overall risk reduction of receiving a mismatched RBC unit was 91·9% for c, and similarly calculated 87·6% for E, and 97·8% for K. Despite that the active cEK‐matching guidelines were applied throughout our entire study cohort, a fraction of females at risk were still exposed to cEK‐incompatible RBC units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Notably, matching against specific high‐immunogenic RBC antigens did not seem to protect against alloimmunisation to other (non‐matched, non‐linked) ‘weaker’ RBC antigens by a mechanism of epitope spreading as suggested by others. 11 Comparing the standard distribution of RBC antigen phenotypes among the Caucasian population 12 to the one in our extended matched study population, the probability for a c‐negative female to randomly receive a c‐positive RBC unit in non‐matching conditions was 80%, whereas in matching conditions it was 6·5%. Thus, the overall risk reduction of receiving a mismatched RBC unit was 91·9% for c, and similarly calculated 87·6% for E, and 97·8% for K. Despite that the active cEK‐matching guidelines were applied throughout our entire study cohort, a fraction of females at risk were still exposed to cEK‐incompatible RBC units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comprehensive genotyping of RHD was done using a diagnostic system RBC‐Ready Gene CDE kit, (Inno‐Train) or, if an RHD variant was not detected, in‐house sequencing that targeted all 10 RHD exons was performed on a genetic analyzer (ABI 3500, Life Technologies). Sequences were analyzed with computer software (SeqScape, Version 3.0, Life Technologies) and detected variants were classified according to The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook and The Human RhesusBase…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding donor demographics, we looked at the donors' sex, age -divided in four categories, i.e., 18-25, 26-40, 41-55, 55+ -and the prevalence of Duffy-antigens as a proxy for people from Sub-Saharan African descent [9].…”
Section: Donor Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly the case for Sub-Saharan African descendants who substantially differ in extended blood types compared with people of European descent, but are also more prone to blood disorders demanding multiple blood transfusions [8,9]. Due to growing multiculturalism, a diverse blood supply is needed to match with future transfusion needs [1].…”
Section: Introduction Underrepresentation In the Blood Donor Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation