1964
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(64)90022-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die thermischen zustandsgrössen von 1,1-difluoräthylen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The newly determined critical temperature is around 0.1 % lower than the values provided previously in the literature by Otto and Thomas [ 12 ] and Low [ 5 ] and is 0.2 % lower than those by Mears et al [ 11 ]. The experimental uncertainty of the temperature measurement at the critical point of the present work is 0.01 K; Mears et al’s uncertainty is 0.5 K, Low’s [ 5 ] uncertainty was stated to be 0.3 K, while Otto and Thomas [ 12 ] optimized the critical parameter using a correlation for the saturation pressures. Therefore, the new measurement can be considered as an improved direct measurement of the critical temperature due to the smaller uncertainty and also since the values are within the uncertainty range of Low’s measurements.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The newly determined critical temperature is around 0.1 % lower than the values provided previously in the literature by Otto and Thomas [ 12 ] and Low [ 5 ] and is 0.2 % lower than those by Mears et al [ 11 ]. The experimental uncertainty of the temperature measurement at the critical point of the present work is 0.01 K; Mears et al’s uncertainty is 0.5 K, Low’s [ 5 ] uncertainty was stated to be 0.3 K, while Otto and Thomas [ 12 ] optimized the critical parameter using a correlation for the saturation pressures. Therefore, the new measurement can be considered as an improved direct measurement of the critical temperature due to the smaller uncertainty and also since the values are within the uncertainty range of Low’s measurements.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…This signifies the reproducibility of the measurement using a different apparatus as well as the accuracy of the critical temperature and density. The R-1132a critical pressures previously provided in the literature by Mears et al [ 11 ], Low [ 5 ] as well as Otto and Thomas [ 12 ] show around 0.3 % deviations from the current value, while the Ambrose method has much higher deviations reaching 5 %. Due to the lower temperature uncertainties as well as the similar values of the critical density value, the newly determined critical pressure within this work can be considered as an improved and updated direct measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations