1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01377490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die systematische Stellung vonTheligonum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Since the inclusion of the herbaceous Theligonum, previously in Theligonaceae, in Rubiaceae (Wunderlich, 1971), it has generally been placed in a monogeneric tribe, Theligoneae. The genus is highly unusual in the family by having, for example, upper leaves with strong anisophylly and male flowers with up to 30 stamens, but the close relationship between Theligoneae and Rubieae has been widely accepted since 1995 .…”
Section: Node I Rubieae Theligoneae and Kelloggiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Since the inclusion of the herbaceous Theligonum, previously in Theligonaceae, in Rubiaceae (Wunderlich, 1971), it has generally been placed in a monogeneric tribe, Theligoneae. The genus is highly unusual in the family by having, for example, upper leaves with strong anisophylly and male flowers with up to 30 stamens, but the close relationship between Theligoneae and Rubieae has been widely accepted since 1995 .…”
Section: Node I Rubieae Theligoneae and Kelloggiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Achatocarpaceae a nd Gyrostemonaceae have been included in the Phytolaccaceae (Heimerl, 1889;Cronquist, 1968) and are unknown in regard to the pigme nt characteristic. The Bataceae a nd Theligonaceae, which are thought to lack both anthocyanins and betalain s, have each bee n treated as a monotypic order by various authors, and the Theligonaceae has also been included in the Myrtales (Melchior, 1964), and as a tribe in the Rubiaceae (Wunderlich , 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently authocyanins have been detected in this genus (Mabry et al, 1975). Strong evidence is accumulating from other phytochemical (Kooiman1 971), as well as morphological and embryological ( Wunderlich, 1971), investigations which indicates that Theligonaceae should be closely related to Rubiaceae.…”
Section: Subclass Levelmentioning
confidence: 96%