Die Internet-Ökonomie

Zerdick, Axel; Picot, Arnold; Schrape, Klaus; Artopé, Alexander; Goldhammer, Klaus; Heger, Dominik K.; Lange, Ulrich T.; Vierkant, Eckart; López‐Escobar, Esteban; Silverstone, Roger

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56418-5

Cited by 221 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Antweiler (1995), S. 71, 73;Ney (2006), S. 244;Brugger (2009), S. 73;Brunold et al (2000), S. 231f. Hinsichtlich der Systematisierung von Erlösformen ist ferner der Ansatz von Wirtz/Kleineicken (2000) zu nennen, welcher sich von Zerdick et al (2001) etwas unterscheidet. So differenzieren erstere grundlegend zwischen direkten und indirekten sowie transaktionsabhängigen und transaktionsunabhängigen Erlösen, wobei sowohl direkte als auch indirekte Erlöse transaktionsabhängig wie -unabhängig sein können.…”

Section: B) Betriebskostenunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meta-Containerplattform : ein wirtschaftlicher Ansatz zur Verbesserung von Sicherheit und Wirtschaftlichkeit in der Containerlogistik?

Döring

2016

Logistik &Amp; Supply Chain Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: B) Betriebskostenunclassified

“…auch Ney (2006), S. 246 und Wirtz (2006), S. 587. 1124 Quelle: Eigene Darstellung in Anlehnung an Zerdick et al (2001), S. 26. 1125 Vgl.…”

Section: B) Betriebskostenunclassified

Meta-Containerplattform : ein wirtschaftlicher Ansatz zur Verbesserung von Sicherheit und Wirtschaftlichkeit in der Containerlogistik?

Döring

2016

Logistik &Amp; Supply Chain Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The temporal aspect is in the foreground of this type of price discrimination. The information providers attempt to create various “profit Windows” (see Zerdick et al , 2001, p. 70 et sequation ) or utilization windows (therefore: Windowing) to tap the full potential as optimally as possible. If the providers did not graduate their offers, cannibalization effects would occur.…”

Section: Nd Degree Price Discrimination With Information Goodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pricing information goods

Linde

2009

Journal of Product &Amp; Brand Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I describe some of the issues involved in pricing information goods such as computer software, databases, electronic journals and so on. In particular I discuss the incentives to engage in differential pricing and examine some of the forms such differential pricing may take. This paper was presented at the Research Libraries Group Symposium on "Scholarship in the New Information Environment" held at Harvard Law School, May 2-3, 1995 and will be published in the conference proceedings.Digital materials typically have the property that it is very costly to produce the first copy and very cheap to produce subsequent copies. It is often said, for example, that the "first copy costs" are more than 70% of the cost of an academic journal. Cost structures of this form pose special problems for pricing.The first problem is that it is very difficult to sustain a competitive market with this sort of cost structure. Economists define a purely competitive market to be one where there are "several" producers of an identical commodity. The market for wheat, corn, shares of IBM stock, etc. are all examples of purely competitive markets. The market for automobiles is not purely competitive since there are not multiple producers of identical products. Instead, there are several somewhat different

show abstract

“…Paid content is still an innovation in its early stage (Picot et al 2001, Stahl 2005, Zerdick et al 2001. In fact, paid content was assumed to be almost impossible in the early days of e-commerce, when content generally had to be for free and subsidized by online advertisements (Dewan et al 2003).…”

Section: Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%