1976
DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19760801205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die G‐Werte von Haq+ und OHaq in wäßriger Lösung

Abstract: Die Ausbeuten an Haq+ und OHaq− wurden nach der Pulsradiolyse von neutralem Wasser mit Hilfe einer Leitfahigkeitsmeßeinrichtung neu bestimmt. Die Werte in Argon‐gesättigter Lösung 0.5 μs nach einem 1 μs Bestrahlungsimpuls mit 2,8 MeV Elektronen sind: G(Haq+)Ar = (3.3 ± 0.25)/100eV, G(OHaq−)λr = 0.60 ± 0.25 (unter der Voraussetzung G(eaq−) = 2,7); mit 10−1 mol/1 Äthanolzusatz beträgt G(eaq−) = 3.2 (optisch gemessen), G(OHaq−) = 0.1 und G(Haq−) = 3,3. In N2O‐gesättigter Lösung betragen G(Haq+)N2O = G(OHaq−)N2O =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we take the total anion yield as the experimental number (3.35), then the yield for N20-saturated solutions at ~100 ns is estimated to be 3.0. Both Schmidt and Ander8 and Klever et al 7 give the OH" yields as 2.9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we take the total anion yield as the experimental number (3.35), then the yield for N20-saturated solutions at ~100 ns is estimated to be 3.0. Both Schmidt and Ander8 and Klever et al 7 give the OH" yields as 2.9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Preliminary experiments4 using -naphthol to scavenge OH" indicate that the concentration of OH' on the 100-ns time scale corresponds to a yield of only -2.85.5 This yield is substantially less than that of ~3.35 which is measured for ion pairs in N20free water by time-resolved conductivity methods. 6,7 In fact, Schmidt and Ander8 as early as 1969 found that the ion pair yield on the microsecond time scale in N20-sa tura ted water was 2.9, which is 14% lower than in argon-saturated water. Klever et al 7 found a similar result and suggested that spur processes were responsible for the observed difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation