2017
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL)

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Erprobung und Validierung einer deutschen Version der Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL, Neacsiu, Rizui, Vitaliano, Lynch & Linehan, 2010 ), einem Fragebogen zur Erhebung der Häufigkeit der Nutzung von Skills, wie sie im Rahmen der Dialektisch-Behavioralen Therapie (DBT) vermittelt werden. Hierzu bearbeiteten 150 Patientinnen mit Borderline Persönlichkeitsstörung eine deutschsprachige Übersetzung, sowie Fragebögen zur Symptomschwere.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Blaming Subscale refers to an individual’s tendency to blame others for their difficulties, with higher scores representing more blaming tendencies. Since its initial creation, the DBT-WCCL’s is regularly found to have strong psychometric properties, such as both good internal consistency reliability and construct validity, resulting in its utilization in a variety of treatment settings (Burmeister et al, 2016; Stein et al, 2015), and remains a commonly-used measurement today (Kells et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Blaming Subscale refers to an individual’s tendency to blame others for their difficulties, with higher scores representing more blaming tendencies. Since its initial creation, the DBT-WCCL’s is regularly found to have strong psychometric properties, such as both good internal consistency reliability and construct validity, resulting in its utilization in a variety of treatment settings (Burmeister et al, 2016; Stein et al, 2015), and remains a commonly-used measurement today (Kells et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%