1979
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die diagnostische Bedeutung von »Steilen Potentialen« für die Erkennung von epileptischen Anfallsleiden )

Abstract: Seit Entdeckung der Steilen Potentiale im EEG wird nach ihrer diagnostischen Bedeutung für die Erkennung von epileptischen Anfallsleiden gefragt. Anhand zweier EEG-Dokumentationen aus Berlin (5001 Erst-EEGs) und Hannover (7094 Erst-EEGs) wird die bedingte Wahrscheinlichkeit für ein epüeptisches Anfallsleiden bei Vorliegen von Steilen Potentialen im EEG berechnet. Es zeigt sich, daß nach Plausibilitäts- und Validitätskorrektur der Schätzwert für die bedingte Wahrscheinlichkeit von 45% auf 63% ansteigt. Die math… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rating of the group and milieu variables was done cooperatively, and in questionable cases it was dicussed until an agreement could be reached. This approach was expected to yield a reliable representation of the different dimensions of a ward session because it could be proven that among a group of experts with different personal experiences the average tends towards objective measurements [6,11]. In addition to the rating procedure, the main themes of interest of the ward session and the number of the various participating therapists were noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rating of the group and milieu variables was done cooperatively, and in questionable cases it was dicussed until an agreement could be reached. This approach was expected to yield a reliable representation of the different dimensions of a ward session because it could be proven that among a group of experts with different personal experiences the average tends towards objective measurements [6,11]. In addition to the rating procedure, the main themes of interest of the ward session and the number of the various participating therapists were noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%