2011
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v20i1.2197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did You Not Understand The Question Or Not? An Investigation Of Negatively Worded Questions In Survey Research

Abstract: This study compared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While negatively worded questions are commonly included to control for respondent bias (Nunnally, Bernstein, & Berge, 1967), Roszkowski and Soven (2010) recommend against including negative questions in a positively stated questionnaire, arguing that the negative questions lead to ambiguity of results instead of controlling for bias. Given that other negatively worded questions have loaded adequately onto their respective construct (see Table 3), we argue that the negatively worded questions in the POS scale may have confused the respondents (Johnson, Bristow, & Schneider, 2010) and are not the result of respondent bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While negatively worded questions are commonly included to control for respondent bias (Nunnally, Bernstein, & Berge, 1967), Roszkowski and Soven (2010) recommend against including negative questions in a positively stated questionnaire, arguing that the negative questions lead to ambiguity of results instead of controlling for bias. Given that other negatively worded questions have loaded adequately onto their respective construct (see Table 3), we argue that the negatively worded questions in the POS scale may have confused the respondents (Johnson, Bristow, & Schneider, 2010) and are not the result of respondent bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Comprehension problems might be specifically prevalent in related question RRT designs. These designs implement positively and negatively worded statements, and require some participants to use a double negative as their response, which has been shown to be potentially confusing (e.g., Johnson, Bristow, & Schneider, 2011). The instructions of the SLD, however, have been modified in a way that generally excludes the possibility of respondents having to solve a double negative: All carriers of the attribute in question are required to respond to the positively worded Statement A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negatively worded statements, especially, double negatives, also require additional cognitive resources to process and often cause confusion. In Johnson, Bristow, and Schneider's () study, 253 college students in the United States completed a seven‐item survey using a six‐point Likert scale. Although a unidimensional factor structure emerged regardless of positive or negative wording, internal consistency did decrease with negatively worded items.…”
Section: Research Findings On the Use Of Negatively Worded Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%