Did Al-Ghazali Deny Causality?

Goodman, Lenn E.

doi:10.2307/1595550

Cited by 32 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Muitas e diversas são as conclusões que dela os comentadores tiram, muitas e diversas são as estratégias de leitura. Destaco, no entanto, as seguintes fontes secundárias: GOODMAN, 1978;MARMURA, 1981MARMURA, e 1995ALON, 1980;ABRAHAMOV, 1988;FRANK, 1992;RIKER, 1996;PERLER & RUDOLPH, 2000;LIZZINI, 2002;e DAIBER, 2015 Cf. FRANK, 1991, p. 11, n. 3;HALEVI, 2002, p. 23.…”

Section: :unclassified

“…FRANK, 1991, p. 11, n. 3;HALEVI, 2002, p. 23. 11 GOODMAN, 1978e MARMURA, 1981 Sobre o tema, cf: GIMARET, 1980;KUKKONEN, 2002;ARIF, 2009;LÓPEZ-FARJEAT, 2015;TAYLOR, 2015;TWETTEN, 2016e RICHARDSON, 2015 : :…”

Section: :mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Al-Ghazali não aceitará a noção de que o impossível é aquilo que viola o PNC, mas o definirá como tudo que "não está sob o poder [de Deus]". O impossível consistirá em afirmar uma coisa e ao mesmo tempo negá-la, afirmar o mais específico enquanto se nega o mais geral, ou afirmar duas coisas enquanto se nega 18 GOODMAN, 1978e 2013. 19 MARMURA, 1981 GOODMAN, 1978, p. 107.…”

Section: :unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sobre a causalidade: tradução da Discussão XVII do Tahafut al-falasifa (Incoerência dos filósofos), de Al-Ghazali

Verza

2021

NBR 6032

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: :unclassified

Section: :mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: :unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sobre a causalidade: tradução da Discussão XVII do Tahafut al-falasifa (Incoerência dos filósofos), de Al-Ghazali

Verza

2021

NBR 6032

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using the example of touching a cotton bud with fire, Ghazali argued that all we can see is that the coming of the two results in the cotton twisting and turning black before becoming ash. Ghazali does not deny causality (Goodman, 1978), he simply argues that there is no way for us to prove the necessary link between X and Y. He further says:…”

Section: Islamic Perspectives On Causalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Causality in Islamic marketing research

Kadirov

Bahiss

Bardakçı

2020

JIMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Highlighting the need for a profound move towards desecularisation of Islamic scholarship, this conceptual paper aims to clarify the concept of causality from the Islamic marketing research perspective and extends a number of suggestions for improving theory building and hypothesis development in the field. Design/methodology/approach The approach taken is largely conceptual. In addition, this study collates the stated hypotheses in the articles published in this journal in the past five years and analyses the structure of causal statements to uncover key tendencies. Findings The review of historical and current views on causality indicates that most commentators agree that assuming the existence of the necessary connection between cause and effect is misleading. The Islamic traditions based on occasionalism and modern science agree that causal statements reflect, at best, probabilistic assumptions. Research limitations/implications This paper offers a number of insights and recommendations for theory building and hypothesis development in Islamic marketing. By following the occasionalism perspective and the notion of Sunnah of Allah, researchers will be able to build methodologically coherent and genuine Islamic marketing knowledge. Practical implications Correctly stated and tested hypotheses can be used by public policymakers to enforce effective consumer and market policies. Originality/value This paper tackles a complex issue of causality in Islamic marketing research which has not hitherto been discussed well in the literature. This research is also a unique step towards developing pioneering avenues within the domain of Islamic marketing research methodology.

show abstract

“…The one who reaches this rank gives up questioning because of the clarity of the One who is responsible for him; thus, there is no point in asking or thinking in the presence of the Almighty One. In the case of annihilation, the relationship between Man and God, be He exalted, is a relation of total submission: "Indeed for Ghazali the conception of man as "the corpse in the hands of the washer" is a central religious motif well suited to the development of a proper appreciation of the nature of finite existence in relation to God" (Goodman 1978).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Causality and its Ethical Status in al-Ghazali’s Epistemological System

Rayan¹

2018

IJIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deals with the issue of causality and its ethical status in al-Ghazali's epistemological system, which is connected with the issue of Jabr and ikhtiyar (compulsion and choice); the issue of al-šabābiyya and tawakkul (causality and reliance), i.e., dependence on God and trust in him; and the issue of work. These issues are based on the relationship between Man and God, be He exalted, and on other issues involving the components of Man himself. Al-Ghazali seeks to revive the necessary relationship between Man and God, be He exalted. tawḥīd (the unity and oneness of God) is the existential origin and epistemological example from which relationships between Man and himself, people and nature are derived, and the establishment of human work, physical or mental, is based on the knowledge of tawḥīd, which guarantees the process of this work will reach the end for which it was created.

show abstract

Did Al-Ghazali Deny Causality?

Cited by 32 publications

References 0 publications

Sobre a causalidade: tradução da Discussão XVII do Tahafut al-falasifa (Incoerência dos filósofos), de Al-Ghazali

Sobre a causalidade: tradução da Discussão XVII do Tahafut al-falasifa (Incoerência dos filósofos), de Al-Ghazali

Causality in Islamic marketing research

Causality and its Ethical Status in al-Ghazali’s Epistemological System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About