2010
DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dichlorvos exposure impedes extraction and amplification of DNA from insects in museum collections

Abstract: BackgroundThe insecticides dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene have been commonly used to eradicate pest insects from natural history collections. However, it is not known how these chemicals affect the DNA of the specimens in the collections. We thus tested the effect of dichlorvos, paradichlorobenzene and naphthalene on DNA of insects (Musca domestica) by extracting and amplifying DNA from specimens exposed to insecticides in two different concentrations over increasing time intervals.ResultsThe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While past work has revealed that museum specimens are a challenging analytical target [21], [22], this study has provided new details on factors that impact DNA sequence recovery. Specimen age was confirmed as an important determinant of sequence recovery, but most specimens yielded a barcode compliant sequence if analyzed within 50 years of collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While past work has revealed that museum specimens are a challenging analytical target [21], [22], this study has provided new details on factors that impact DNA sequence recovery. Specimen age was confirmed as an important determinant of sequence recovery, but most specimens yielded a barcode compliant sequence if analyzed within 50 years of collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specimens were selected for analysis based on their age and collection site, but sequencing success would have risen if collector had also been considered. The cause of these collector effects is uncertain, but may reflect differential killing agents, treatment during specimen preparation, and/or subsequent storage conditions [22]. The strength of these effects suggests the value of conducting a performance test on a subset of representative specimens from each major collector before launching large-scale efforts at barcode recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the specimens were pinned and dried to study external morphology; as such, the soft tissue inside exoskeleton was dried and decomposed by time without chemical preservative treatment (Dick, Bridge, Wheeler, & Desalle, ; Sutrisno, ), resulting in limited intact DNA source. Second, dichlorvos, a preservative chemical used to prevent collection pest, may negatively affect DNA amplification (Espeland et al, ; Werblow et al, ) and third, other physical factors might affect DNA integrity. For example, partial dehydration and exposure to air and light may potentially lead to DNA degradation, particularly deamination of cystidine residues (Mitchell, Willerslev, & Hansen, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative direct PCR results using legs as templates could be attributed to the conservation of the specimens. For the prevention of collection pests, dry preparations have often been treated with the insecticide dichlorvos, which affects the DNA of insects negatively (Espeland et al, 2010). Other parameters that may influence the amplification are the primer pairs and the polymerase used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%