We also applied Strakhov's method of comparative lithology [3] and utilized the map of recent sediment distribution in the Indian Ocean as a reference [7]. Sed iment thickness was determined for each Pleistocene section using all available data, using the sedimentation rates provided by Lisitsyn [8] as a reference.This study is based on data collected during deep sea drilling in the pelagic zones of the Indian Ocean (DSDP Legs 22 28 and ODP Legs 115 121). In addi tion, we used evidence obtained by the IMAGES project [9], as well as extensive published data on the Pleistocene sediments and Quaternary paleoceanogra phy ([10-12] and others).The results were two lithofacies maps of the Indian Ocean, which were created as azimuthal equal area equatorial projections at a scale of 1 : 35000000 for the Eopleistocene (Q 1 , within the 1.8-0.8 Ma interval) (Fig. 1) and the Neopleistocene (Q 2 + 3 , 0.8-0.01 Ma) (Fig. 2) (the boundaries of the subdivisions are after [13]). The boundary between the Eopleistocene and Neopleistocene was chosen to coincide with the Matuyama-Brunhes reversal [13]. The choice of these stratigraphic subdivisions was based on the global cool ing trend and more pronounced glacial-interglacial cli mate variations in the Neopleistocene relative to the Eopleistocene [14].The maps show the distributions of the main facies (abyssal, pelagic, and hemipelagic) defined by the boundaries between the bottom sedimentary environ ments, the locations of a series of submarine intraplate rises at depths of commonly less than 3 km, areas of mid oceanic ridge basaltic volcanism of the respective age, and areas of non deposition. The area, thickness, Abstract-We compiled lithofacies maps for the early and middle-late Pleistocene (Eopleistocene and Neo pleistocene, respectively) pelagic sedimentation of the Indian Ocean and a database for sediment thicknesses in the respective stratigraphic subdivisions. Using these data, we calculated areas, volumes, masses, and intensities of accumulation of main sediment types for both Pleistocene subdivisions. A comparison of the results confirmed a strong increase in the rate of terrigenous sedimentation. Special attention was given to the evolution of siliceous and carbonate sedimentation of the biogenic type.