Diathesis-stress Model

Goforth, Anisa N.; Pham, Andy V.; Carlson, John S.

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_845

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, we hypothesized that we would find interaction effects between the intrinsic predictors and maternal sensitivity in line with the diathesis-stress model and the theory of differential susceptibility, but contrary to our expectations based on theory (Belsky, Bakermans-Kranenburg, et al, 2007; Goforth et al, 2011) and empirical findings (Rochette & Bernier, 2016), we did not. We can only speculate as to why this is.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 85%

“…We believe that two different frameworks for understanding interaction effects can be applied to investigate interactions in relation to ADHD symptoms. First, the diathesis-stress model, which posits that genetic or biological vulnerabilities interact with social stressors to create deficits (Goforth, Pham, & Carlson, 2011). Second, the theory of differential susceptibility, which suggests children with certain characteristics or plasticity factors, such as a difficult temperament (e.g., high levels of negative emotionality and/or positive affectivity/surgency), to be more susceptible of both positive and negative aspects of environmental factors such as sensitive parenting (Belsky, 2005; Belsky, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van IJzendoorn, 2007; Rochette & Bernier, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Can reactivity and regulation in infancy predict inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior in 3-year-olds?

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A need to identify early infant markers of later occurring inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behaviors has come to the fore in the current attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder literature. The purpose of such studies is to identify driving mechanisms that could enable early detection of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder liability and thus facilitate early intervention. Here we study independent and interactive effects of cognitive regulation (inhibition and sustained attention), temperament (reactive and regulatory aspects), and maternal sensitivity (as external regulation) in a sample of 112 typically developing 10-month-old infants (59 boys, 52.7%), in relation to inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior at 3 years. The results showed that infant temperamental regulation and maternal sensitivity made independent contributions to both inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, in that higher levels of temperamental regulation and maternal sensitivity were related to less inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior. In addition, the temperamental factor positive affectivity/surgency made a significant contribution to later hyperactivity/impulsivity, in that higher levels of positive affectivity/surgency were related to more hyperactive/impulsive behavior. No interaction effects were found. Our findings suggest temperament and parental regulation as potential and independent markers of later inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 85%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Can reactivity and regulation in infancy predict inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior in 3-year-olds?

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Guided by theories that account for the interplay between aspects of person-level characteristics (e.g., biology) and their social context (Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1994; Lerner, Johnson, & Buckingham, 2015; Sameroff, 2010), a diathesis stress model refers to the notion that an individual's dispositional risk or vulnerability for psychopathology is activated under conditions of environmental stress (Goforth, Pham, & Carlson, 2011; Zuckerman, 1999). Consistent with this notion, several twin studies have shown that the genetic influences on adolescent alcohol and drug use are amplified in the context of poor parent–child relationship quality, low parental monitoring, greater antisocial peer affiliation, and greater stressful life events (Dick, 2011; Dick et al, 2007a; Dick et al, 2007b; Harden, Hill, Turkheimer, & Emery, 2008; Hicks et al, 2009; 2013, 2014).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality, romantic relationships, and alcohol use disorder symptoms in adolescence and young adulthood: An evaluation of personality × social context interplay

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research has shown that person-level characteristics (e.g., temperament, personality) correlate and interact with social-contextual factors (e.g., parent–child relationship quality, antisocial peer affiliation) to predict adolescent substance use, but less research has examined similar processes for adult substance use problems. We addressed this gap by testing for personality × romantic partner context interplay in relation to symptoms of alcohol use disorder (AUD) at ages 24 and 29. Participants were twins in the longitudinal Minnesota Twin Family Study (N = 2,769; 52% female). Results support the corresponsive principle of personality in that we found that key personality traits in late adolescence (low constraint, negative emotionality) predicted subsequent “selection” into key social contexts in early adulthood (poorer quality romantic relationships and greater romantic partner alcohol use), which subsequently reinforced those traits and associated outcomes (including correlated AUD symptoms) through late young adulthood. There were few meaningful gender differences in these associations. There was also no support for the personality × romantic partner context interaction as a significant predictor of AUD symptoms at ages 24 or 29. Taken together with prior studies, these results suggest that such interactions may be less relevant to the development of young adult AUD compared to adolescent substance use problems.

show abstract

“…Our theoretical framework is the stress-vulnerability perspective, which argues that risk for psychological problems is higher among adolescents who are more vulnerable and exposed to stressors (Grant, Compas, Thurm, McMahon, & Gipson, 2004;Grant & McMahon, 2005). The stress-vulnerability framework resembles the diathesis-stress model, which refers to genetic or biological vulnerabilities (Goforth, Pham, & Carlson, 2011) and has been used to explain, for example, the onset of depression or schizophrenia (Bandura, Pastorelli, Barbaranelli, & Caprara, 1999). Moreover, the stress-vulnerability perspective includes such characteristics and individual traits as vulnerability factors, which develop throughout adolescents' life experiences and make adolescents more prone to psychological problems, for example, antisocial behavior (Hankin et al, 2005).…”

Section: Vulnerability Factors For Conduct Problemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conduct problems, schoolwork difficulties, and being bullied: A follow-up among Finnish adolescents

Minkkinen

Hotulainen

Kinnunen

et al. 2018

International Journal of School & Educational Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Continual conduct problems from adolescence to adulthood comprise a societal concern. Knowledge of school-related triggers and contributors to persistent conduct problems is important but still limited. We explored the role of schoolwork difficulties and being bullied by peers at school in the development of conduct problems, controlling for vulnerability factors of low cognitive competence and low prosociality. The data covered two measuring points on a longitudinal cohort of Finnish students between the ages of 16 and 18 (N = 5,108). All measures were self-reported. The regression and moderation modeling were executed using Bayesian estimation. Among 18-year-old adolescents, 14% of conduct problems were explained by conduct problems at the age of 16. Schoolwork difficulties had a direct positive effect on later conduct problems. Being bullied moderated effects of low cognitive competence and earlier conduct problems on later conduct problems. The findings show that we should also focus on school when risk factors for continuity of adolescents' conduct problems are sought out.

show abstract

Diathesis-stress Model

Cited by 13 publications

References 5 publications

Can reactivity and regulation in infancy predict inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior in 3-year-olds?

Can reactivity and regulation in infancy predict inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behavior in 3-year-olds?

Personality, romantic relationships, and alcohol use disorder symptoms in adolescence and young adulthood: An evaluation of personality × social context interplay

Conduct problems, schoolwork difficulties, and being bullied: A follow-up among Finnish adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About