Abstract:A need to identify early infant markers of later occurring inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive behaviors has come to the fore in the current attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder literature. The purpose of such studies is to identify driving mechanisms that could enable early detection of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder liability and thus facilitate early intervention. Here we study independent and interactive effects of cognitive regulation (inhibition and sustained attention), temperament (reac… Show more
“…Furthermore, there is evidence for a predictive association between parent report of attentional control in infancy and childhood behavioural difficulties, even in general community samples. Low parent-reported attentional focus scores at age 18-32 months are associated with elevated internalising and externalising problems at 37-59 months (Gartstein, Putnam, & Rothbart, 2012), whilst individual differences at 10 months of age in a composite attention-regulatory measure are predictive of ADHD-related behaviours at age 3 years (Frick, Forslund, & Brocki, 2019). In combination, these studies indicate that infant attentional control is measurable?…”
Section: Investigating Early Development Of Attentional Controlmentioning
Autism is frequently associated with difficulties with top-down attentional control, which impact on individualsâ mental health and quality of life. The developmental processes involved in these attentional difficulties are not well understood. Using a data-driven approach, 2 samples (N=294 and 412) of infants at elevated and typical likelihood of autism were grouped according to profiles of parent report of attention at 10, 15 and 25 months. In contrast to the normative profile of increases in attentional control scores between infancy and toddlerhood, a minority (7-9%) showed plateauing attentional control scores between 10 and 25 months. Consistent with pre-registered hypotheses, plateaued growth of attentional control was associated with elevated autism and ADHD traits, and lower adaptive functioning at age 3 years.
“…Furthermore, there is evidence for a predictive association between parent report of attentional control in infancy and childhood behavioural difficulties, even in general community samples. Low parent-reported attentional focus scores at age 18-32 months are associated with elevated internalising and externalising problems at 37-59 months (Gartstein, Putnam, & Rothbart, 2012), whilst individual differences at 10 months of age in a composite attention-regulatory measure are predictive of ADHD-related behaviours at age 3 years (Frick, Forslund, & Brocki, 2019). In combination, these studies indicate that infant attentional control is measurable?…”
Section: Investigating Early Development Of Attentional Controlmentioning
Autism is frequently associated with difficulties with top-down attentional control, which impact on individualsâ mental health and quality of life. The developmental processes involved in these attentional difficulties are not well understood. Using a data-driven approach, 2 samples (N=294 and 412) of infants at elevated and typical likelihood of autism were grouped according to profiles of parent report of attention at 10, 15 and 25 months. In contrast to the normative profile of increases in attentional control scores between infancy and toddlerhood, a minority (7-9%) showed plateauing attentional control scores between 10 and 25 months. Consistent with pre-registered hypotheses, plateaued growth of attentional control was associated with elevated autism and ADHD traits, and lower adaptive functioning at age 3 years.
“…Data were not collected from five children at 18 months due to a reported lack of time ( n = 2) and that the parent missed filling out the form ( n = 3), but they were still included in the final sample. In short, the sample was recruited through the birth registry of Uppsala, Sweden (for a full description, see Frick, Forslund, Fransson et al ., ). Mail was sent out to families of all newborns with a general inquiry about participating in studies within the lab (retention rate ~30%) and interested families were then informed about this specific study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We used the Maternal Sensitivity Scales (Ainsworth, ) to assess maternal sensitivity during a semiâstructured play session that lasted 26 min (Pederson, Moran, & Bento, ). The session contained different blocks with different levels of demand on the mothers (e.g., free play with and without toys while the mother was busy filling out a form, dyadic free play with and without toys, reading a book together, and playing together with a toy that was difficult to master for the child) and have been described in detail elsewhere (Frick, Forslund, Fransson et al ., ). The filmed procedure was coded as a whole on a nineâpoint scale in accordance with Ainsworth's scale of sensitivity vs. insensitivity (1969), which addresses the mother's capacity to identify, interpret, and adequately respond to the infant's signals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At each time point, the families received a gift certificate worth approximately 20 US$. The tasks and measures used in this study were part of a larger longitudinal study aimed at assessing development of various aspects of selfâregulation over time, and data on maternal sensitivity has been reported elsewhere (Frick, Forslund & Brocki, ; Frick, Forslund, Fransson et al ., ). The local ethics committee in Uppsala, Sweden approved the study (EPN; dnr: 2011/165, â'the EFFECT studyâ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, maternal support was concurrently related to emotion regulation in 3â4âyearâolds (Cole, Dennis, SmithâSimon & Cohen, ) and maternal responsiveness at 4 years predicted delay of gratification 1 year later (PauliâPott et al ., ). Also, maternal sensitivity predicted emotion regulation at 18 months in the present sample, but we did not find the expected link to EF at the same age, possibly due to lack of stability of cognitive function at that early age (Frick, Forslund, Fransson et al ., ). One potential pathway that links responsive parenting to later selfâregulation is verbal ability, in that responsive parenting is predictive of language, which in turn works as a regulatory function that aids the development of selfâregulation.…”
2019). Does child verbal ability mediate the relationship between maternal sensitivity and later self-regulation? A longitudinal study from infancy to 4 years. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60, 97-105.There is a need to further examine the mechanisms by which maternal sensitivity influences the development of child self-regulation. This study investigated the role of maternal sensitivity when infants were 10 months old and child verbal ability at 18 months, in relation to various aspects of selfregulation at 48 months, in a sample of 95 typically developing children (46.3% girls). In particular, the study examined, from a Vygotskian perspective, whether child verbal ability, as measured by receptive and expressive language, mediated the relationship between maternal sensitivity and hot and cool aspects of self-regulation in the child. As hypothesized, maternal sensitivity predicted child verbal ability, as well as working memory, set shifting, and delay of gratification. Child receptive language predicted set shifting, inhibition, and delay of gratification. In addition, receptive language mediated the relationship between maternal sensitivity and inhibition only. Additive effects of maternal sensitivity and child receptive language in relation to set shifting were found, and a main effect of maternal sensitivity on child delay of gratification. The results add to the body of research suggesting that responsive parenting and child verbal ability are important for the development of self-regulation, and suggest that different mechanisms may be at work for different aspects of self-regulation.
Children born after threatened preterm labour (TPL), regardless of whether it ends in preterm birth, may represent an undescribed âADHD clusterâ. The aim of this cohort study is to identify early temperament and psychomotor manifestations and risk factors of TPL children who present ADHD symptoms. One hundred and seventeen motherâchild pairs were followed from TPL diagnosis until the childâs 6 years of life. TPL children were divided according to the prematurity status into three groups: full-term TPL (nâ=â26), late-preterm TPL (nâ=â53), and very-preterm TPL (nâ=â38). A non-TPL group (nâ=â50) served as control. Temperament and psychomotor development at age 6 months and ADHD symptoms at age 6 years were assessed. Perinatal and psychosocial factors were also recorded. All TPL groups showed higher severity of ADHD symptoms compared with non-TPL children (difference in meansâ+â4.19 for the full-term group,â+â3.64 for the late-preterm group, and â+â4.99 for the very-preterm group, all psâ<â0.021). Concretely, very-preterm and late-preterm TPL children showed higher restless/impulsive behaviours, whereas full-term TPL children showed higher emotional lability behaviours. Higher surgency/extraversion and delayed fine motor skills at age 6 months predicted ADHD symptoms at 6 years in TPL children. Male sex, maternal state anxiety symptoms at TPL diagnosis, low parental education, and past maternal experience of traumatic events predicted higher ADHD symptoms in TPL children. Therefore, TPL children may have a higher risk for developing ADHD symptoms, presenting a phenotype that depends on the prematurity status. Moreover, the specific combination of early manifestations and risk factors suggests that TPL children may conform an undescribed group at-risk of ADHD symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.