Diaspora and mapping methodologies: tracing transnational digital connections with ‘mattering maps’

Abstract

There is a methodological tendency in work on diaspora and digital media for quantitative investigations to approach diaspora in static ways that contrast with theories of diaspora as a dynamic cultural formation. On the other hand, qualitative, ethnographic work tends not to engage with digital methods and quantitative data‐driven investigation. In this article, we sketch this methodological and disciplinary disconnect and address it by proposing a model for understanding digitally mediated formations of diaspora that combines digital methods techniques with a sensitivity to ethical and theoretical discussions of migration and diaspora. Drawing on interpretive epistemologies and feminist research ethics, we present a case study analysis of a locally informed, Turkish–Dutch issue. We argue for a method that produces ‘mattering maps’. This involves tracking and visualizing digital traces of an issue across web platforms (Google Search results, Facebook pages, and Instagram posts) and integrating this with an analysis of the face‐to‐face interview responses of a key issue actor.

Digital Diasporas: Postcoloniality, Media and Affect

“…This is an attempt to find an alternative to hypertextual analysis, in order not to essentialize or define a priori what a diaspora is and how it operates online via websites. 5 The idea is to understand and trace the connectivity, which is also changeable and fleeting, testifying to the mutable nature of online platforms as well as the constant redefinition of diasporic spaces and belonging (Alinejad et al 2019).…”

Precarious migrants, migration regimes and digital technologies: the empowerment-control nexus

“…Nevertheless, the same digital tools that empower refugees during their passage to Europe can also be used against them. Digital traces can serve as a vector for hostile political regimes from origin countries to track political opponents (Alinejad et al 2018;Gillespie et al 2016). There is also a risk of relying on misinformation that can put the migration project in jeopardy.…”

The Digital Mediation of Migration: A Qualitative Thematic Synthesis

“…Several authors argue that digital media and technologies can enable migrants to navigate their journeys to Europe with greater ease and security (Andersson, 2019;Dhoest, 2019;Gillespie et al, 2018;Kutscher & Kreß, 2018;Mandic, 2017;Milivojevic, 2018). The greater connectivity afforded through these mediums facilitates the formation of transnational communities between families, friends and shared sociocultural identities (Alinejad et al, 2019;Almenara-Niebla & Ascanio-Sánchez, 2019;Bayramoğlu & Lünenborg, 2018;Belloni, 2019;Dekker et al, 2016;Dekker & Engbersen, 2014;Dhoest, 2019;Ferra & Nguyen, 2017;Fiedler, 2019;Leurs, 2016;Patterson & Leurs, 2019;Pérez & Salgado, 2018;Tanzanu, 2018;Urchs et al, 2019). As a result, close and long ties can be developed and maintained across territorial boundaries, building transnational networks that are both a product and motor of migration.…”