1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77279-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter of Normal Extraocular Recti Muscles With Echography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(12) showed that EOM in patients with TAO and active inflammation presented different reflectivity, deducing that US reflectivity is a reliable method to determine TAO disease activity. Several explanations can be given for the poor correlation between US and MRI in EOM thickness measurement: external eye muscles are oval-shaped and US examinations are not made at a perfect perpendicular angle (14); low US accuracy could be due to the presence of some artifacts or fibrosis often found in TAO EOM, which makes muscle delimitation very difficult (10,14,24), and the fact that MRI seems to be more accurate to visualize the back portion of the orbit (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(12) showed that EOM in patients with TAO and active inflammation presented different reflectivity, deducing that US reflectivity is a reliable method to determine TAO disease activity. Several explanations can be given for the poor correlation between US and MRI in EOM thickness measurement: external eye muscles are oval-shaped and US examinations are not made at a perfect perpendicular angle (14); low US accuracy could be due to the presence of some artifacts or fibrosis often found in TAO EOM, which makes muscle delimitation very difficult (10,14,24), and the fact that MRI seems to be more accurate to visualize the back portion of the orbit (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical activity score (CAS) is not enough to help diagnosis for this reason different imaging techniques that enable visualization of the orbit contents and evaluation of extraocular muscles (EOM) have been tested (9)(10)(11). US enables differential diagnosis in proptosis and seems to reveal the existing inflammation (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Computed tomography scan (CT) shows muscle thickness, diagnoses compressive optical neuropathy and defines the degree of proptosis but does not detect activity (1,10,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hands of an experienced orbital ultrasonographer, the test is relatively reliable, accessible, and inexpensive. Byrne et al (70) have completed a careful assessment of extraocular muscle dimensions as measured by A-and B-mode echography using modern instrumentation. Healthy extraocular muscles ranged in diameter from 2X6^0X5 mm for the inferior rectus to 5X3^0X7 mm for the levator complex.…”
Section: Ultrasound (Us)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of maximal muscle width is dependent on the angle of incidence of the ultrasound beam which is not always perfectly perpendicular to the muscle surface due to variations in orbital anatomy. Furthermore, extraocular muscles are oval shaped and not round 16,28 . In TAO, US evaluation of extraocular muscles can be even more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages and disadvantages of different radiological modalities in TAO have been discussed in several published reviews 12,13 . Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive, well-established, and widely used imaging modality that enables differential diagnosis of proptosis, evaluation and measurement of extraocular muscles, assessment of the optic nerve, and detection of the existing inflammation [14][15][16][17][18][19] . Its disadvantage is low interobserver reproducibility 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%