1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.361283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter-dependent optical losses in pillar microcavities

Abstract: Optical losses in pillar microcavities have been measured directly by means of microreflectance spectroscopy. It was shown that optical losses of the cavities larger than about 3 μm were constant irrespective of the diameters. The lasing thresholds were also measured, and they were proportional to the cavity volume. This result is consistent with the measured constant optical losses. A drastic increase in optical losses has been observed when reducing the cavity diameters below 2 μm. The scattering losses due … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the FM of the 1 µm pillar at 2.965 eV, an FWHM of 12.5 meV and, thus, a Q factor of 240 can be determined which is comparable to the value measured for the planar structure. For an 800 nm pillar, a slight decrease of Q is obtained, demonstrating that residual sidewall roughness becomes more important for small pillars 39, 40, 54–57. The influence of conicity of the pillar on the Q factor cannot be completely disregarded, as theoretical calculations have shown 58, 59.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the FM of the 1 µm pillar at 2.965 eV, an FWHM of 12.5 meV and, thus, a Q factor of 240 can be determined which is comparable to the value measured for the planar structure. For an 800 nm pillar, a slight decrease of Q is obtained, demonstrating that residual sidewall roughness becomes more important for small pillars 39, 40, 54–57. The influence of conicity of the pillar on the Q factor cannot be completely disregarded, as theoretical calculations have shown 58, 59.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays there are two principles of generating MCs with three‐dimensional optical confinement, namely top–down‐structuring via etching from planar MC samples 33, 39–45, or bottom‐up by self‐assembled growth of heterostructures on the nanoscale 46–50. As the latter approach is still under development, no successful cavity structures produced that way have been presented so far.…”
Section: Focused Ion Beam Millingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that refractive index perturbations can lead to scattering, increasing cavity loss rates and impacting the spatial emission profile of excited atoms within a cavity [21]. The influence of sidewall roughness on optical losses has been demonstrated, reducing scattering effects as a critical factor in achieving high-quality optical structures [22,23]. In p-type silicon substrates, the optical losses in a waveguide are due to free carrier absorption more than surface scattering losses or volume scattering [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%