Dialogue Police, Decision Making, and the Management of Public Order During Protest Crowd Events

Abstract

Following the major riots within England in August 2011, the efficacy of public order police decision making was brought into a sharp focus. None the less, the reform of this mode of policing within the UK was already underway with a strong emphasis upon policing through consent and the need to facilitate peaceful protest through dialogue and communication. This paper reports upon a critical ‘test case’ for this ‘new approach’ by analysing the policing of a series of protests against Government policy across 3 days that surrounded a Government party conference in Sheffield, a large city in the north of England. This paper draws out lessons to be learned from what proved to be a highly successful dialogue‐based approach to policing protests. We contend that dialogue and liaison were effective because they allowed for an ongoing dynamic risk assessment that improved command‐level decision making and enhanced police proportionality. The subsequent impact upon crowd dynamics allowed for an improved capacity for proactive public order management, encouraged ‘self‐regulation’ in the crowd, and avoided the unnecessary police use of force at moments of tension. The implications of the analysis for theory and practice are discussed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Policing football ‘risk’? A participant action research case study of a liaison-based approach to ‘public order’

“…It also had the corresponding effect of avoiding the otherwise inevitable escort through the city centre and the expensive deployment of a helicopter. These outcomes are entirely in line with those 'de-escalatory' functions associated with PLT deployment in the context of protest (Gorringe et al, 2011, Stott et al, 2012.…”

“…On match days they are usually deployed to monitor pubs, travel hubs and other places where fans will gather. Their assessment is the primary basis for the host police operation to categorise fans 3 , which in turn has a profound impact on how they are policed (Hopkins, 2014;Hopkins & Hamilton-Smith, 2014;Stott, et al, , 2012. However, research also suggests that when dealing with 'risk' fans 'spotters' can have an important 'liaison' role that can sometimes be undermined by their parallel criminal intelligence duties and it remains unclear how the role 'spotters' and dedicated PLTs will interact (XXXX).…”

Unconditional Respect: Change of Mindset for Effective and Safe Policing

“…Also, the revised edition of Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) contains the same message: that the world of protest has changed and that police practice must change to meet those changes (ACPO 2010). Gorringe et al [12] stated that "In other words, the success of dialogue units depends not just on what they do, but on what they are seen to do and how this is interpreted within the crowd prevention" (p. 4). Dixon sums it up: "What we need is a new policing, not the old 'professionalism' dressed up with tactics, technology, and rhetoric" [6].…”

“…Within POP the more sweeping police encounters, increasing the risk of including non criminal individuals, that are associated with zero-tolerance and stop-and-frisk are replaced with more selective actions and interaction. Another method that has shown positive results is the use of dialogue-based policing, a method for management of protest events, which comprises flexibility and reflexion, as well as prevention [12,13]. This method is dependent upon facilitating a continuous channel of communication-based trust, between protesters and police [14].…”

Policing the Coronavirus Outbreak: Processes and Prospects for Collective Disorder

“…The need for the police to work with and for the community is why, during a crisis such as the present one, the maintenance and indeed the extension of community dialogue and neighbourhood policing become more urgent than ever (Gorringe et al, 2012). In this regard, it is important to consider what police resources will be available (e.g.…”