Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces IV
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3304-4_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogue-Based Design of Web Usability Questionnaires Using Ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory. The analysis of these methods is supported by Barriocanal, Sicilia Urbán, González, and Hilera (2005), who mention that these methods demonstrate reliability and validity for an evaluation scale. Note that university, government and hospital websites, for example, were not included, as these websites are often informational and non-transactional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theory. The analysis of these methods is supported by Barriocanal, Sicilia Urbán, González, and Hilera (2005), who mention that these methods demonstrate reliability and validity for an evaluation scale. Note that university, government and hospital websites, for example, were not included, as these websites are often informational and non-transactional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Popular questionnaires used to assess usability or user attitudes such as SUS (System Usability Scale) (Brooke, 1996), WAMI (Website Analysis and Measurement Inventory) (Kirakowski and Cierlik, 1998), PUTQ (Purdue Usability Testing Questionnaire) (Lin et al, 1997), IsoMetrics (Gediga et al, 1999), and UFO (Usability Questionnaire for Online Shops) (Konradt et al, 2003) are not always directly applicable depending on the application domain, and they also may not cover all aspects in need of evaluation (Díaz et al, 2002;Konradt et al, 2003). Moreover, theirs scales cannot demonstrate reliability and validity (Barriocanal et al, 2005).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%