2016
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.013874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Brain Biopsy for Suspected Primary Central Nervous System Angiitis

Abstract: Background and Purpose-The utility and safety of brain biopsy for suspected primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) are uncertain. Factors predictive of a positive biopsy have not been well described. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brain biopsy in suspected PACNS and determine whether any prebiopsy variables are associated with a positive biopsy. Methods-This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic brain biopsy for PACNS at a single i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is undoubtable that histopathological proof is the gold standard in the diagnostic work-up of PACNS patients, but the yield of positive biopsy might be lower in patients that present with recurrent strokes and vessel abnormalities on neuroimaging presumably caused by more proximal vasculitic processes which are not accessible by biopsy. In those cases, a careful selection of patients for brain biopsy is advisable especially with regard to the findings of a recently published study showing a relatively high risk of biopsy (16%) with a low yield of histopathological proof of PACNS (11%) in 79 patients who underwent biopsy for suspected PACNS 27. An alternative diagnosis could be established in 30% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is undoubtable that histopathological proof is the gold standard in the diagnostic work-up of PACNS patients, but the yield of positive biopsy might be lower in patients that present with recurrent strokes and vessel abnormalities on neuroimaging presumably caused by more proximal vasculitic processes which are not accessible by biopsy. In those cases, a careful selection of patients for brain biopsy is advisable especially with regard to the findings of a recently published study showing a relatively high risk of biopsy (16%) with a low yield of histopathological proof of PACNS (11%) in 79 patients who underwent biopsy for suspected PACNS 27. An alternative diagnosis could be established in 30% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSA, however, shows limited sensitivity/specificity that can be as low as 30% for IVas, and only 25–43% of pathologically-proven primary angiitis have luminal abnormalities on angiography 48 . If there is suspicion for IVas, invasive tests such as brain biopsy may be implemented, which carry a significant risk of morbidity, but also show sensitivities of only 53–80% for vasculitis 9, 10 . ICAD frequently remodels outwardly, resulting in luminal-based underestimation of disease burden 11 , and luminal imaging may not detect culprit plaques at all 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been confirmed by Depreitere et al, who reported that the small size of biopsy samples was the primary reason for failure and problematic histological interpretation 11 . In a study by Torres et al, biopsies without useful data were substantially smaller in size than diagnostic biopsies (median 0.15 cm 3 versus 0.4 cm 3 ; P = 0.02) 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%