Background and Purpose
Our goal is to determine the added value of intracranial vessel wall MRI (IVWI) in differentiating non-occlusive vasculopathies compared to luminal imaging alone.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed images from patients with both luminal and IVWI to identify cases with clinically defined intracranial vasculopathies: atherosclerosis (ICAD), reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) and inflammatory vasculopathy (IVas). Two neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data reviewed the luminal imaging of defined luminal stenoses/irregularities and evaluated the pattern of involvement to make a presumed diagnosis with diagnostic confidence. Six weeks later, the 2 raters re-reviewed the luminal imaging in addition to IVWI for the pattern of wall involvement, presence and pattern of post-contrast enhancement, and presumed diagnosis and confidence. Analysis was performed on a per-lesion and per-patient basis.
Results
30 ICAD, 12 IVas and 12 RCVS patients with 201 lesions (90 ICAD, 64 RCVS and 47 IVas) were included. For both per-lesion and per-patient analyses, there was significant diagnostic accuracy improvement with luminal imaging+IVWI when compared to luminal imaging alone (per-lesion: 88.8% vs. 36.1%, p<.001, per-patient: 96.3% vs. 43.5%, p<.001), respectively. There was substantial inter-rater diagnostic agreement for luminal imaging+IVWI (κ 0.72) and only slight agreement for luminal imaging (κ 0.04). While there was a significant correlation for both luminal and IVWI pattern of wall involvement with diagnosis, there was a stronger correlation for IVWI finding of lesion eccentricity and ICAD diagnosis than for luminal imaging (κ 0.69 vs. 0.18, p<.001).
Conclusion
IVWI can significantly improve the differentiation of non-occlusive intracranial vasculopathies when combined with traditional luminal imaging modalities.