2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of faecal calprotectin in paediatric gastroenterology clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
80
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it is remarkable that faecal S100A12 was not elevated in viral gastroenteritis as was faecal calprotectin. Elevated levels of faecal calprotectin have also been reported in one previous study including bacterial enteritis and rotavirus infections 53. In contrast, faecal S100A12 was not elevated in viral gastroenteritis, which was also reported for lactoferrin, indicating that these markers are more specific for neutrophils than calprotectin and that neutrophil activation is less involved in viral gastroenteritis than in bacterial infections 54…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this regard, it is remarkable that faecal S100A12 was not elevated in viral gastroenteritis as was faecal calprotectin. Elevated levels of faecal calprotectin have also been reported in one previous study including bacterial enteritis and rotavirus infections 53. In contrast, faecal S100A12 was not elevated in viral gastroenteritis, which was also reported for lactoferrin, indicating that these markers are more specific for neutrophils than calprotectin and that neutrophil activation is less involved in viral gastroenteritis than in bacterial infections 54…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Faecal calprotectin levels mainly reflect migration of neutrophils into the gut mucosa, and is a non-specific marker of intestinal inflammation elevated in children with gastroenteritis 45. Faecal calprotectin is markedly higher during infancy than in later childhood 46.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBD remains a histological diagnosis requiring intestinal biopsies, so a positive calprotectin or lactoferrin will require further tests not only to confirm or refute a diagnosis of IBD, but also to exclude other causes of raised biomarkers including malignancy, polyps, viral or bacterial gastroenteritis, NSAID enteropathy, untreated coeliac disease or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 27. Therefore the use of faecal biomarkers should be restricted to situations where the result along with clinical judgement informs a decision about treatment, allows avoidance of invasive tests, or where invasive tests have not provided a satisfactory conclusion—for example, a normal colonoscopy but clinical suspicion of small bowel inflammation.…”
Section: What Cautions and Limitations Are There Of Using Faecal Biommentioning
confidence: 99%