2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
231
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
231
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield for the different needle sizes or the number of passes. There have been similar findings in other studies [14,16].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, there was no significant difference in diagnostic yield for the different needle sizes or the number of passes. There have been similar findings in other studies [14,16].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings make sense conceptually, but they have not been replicated consistently in other studies. For instance, the anatomic location of GISTs has not been demonstrated to improve diagnostic yield [14,16], whereas improved yield with increasing size of the lesion has been suggested [15,16]. However, it has also been reported that the yield may actually decrease, presumably because of necrosis, if the lesion size is [10 cm [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS-FNA biopsy is currently considered the standard method for samples of submucosal tumors (SMTs). Mekky et al [8] reported that EUS-guided FNA was an accurate method for the diagnosis of gastric SMTs, and the diagnostic yield was 43.3 %. Recently, de la Serna-Higuera et al [9] reported that EUS-guided needle-knife incision and forceps biopsy (SINK biopsy) could be a reliable alternative to conventional FNA, providing larger samples that improve the histologic yield for upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs), but there are few reports about SINK biopsy and it is not yet an established technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitive cytological and/or histological verification of larger gastric GIST is currently achieved in 50%-70% of EUS-guided fineneedle aspiration (FNA) or EUS-guided Trucut punch biopsies [10][11][12][13][14][15] . The histological diagnosis of GIST requires immunohistochemical detection of CD117 and particularly in CD117-negative tumors of DOG1 with the corresponding histomorphological findings.…”
Section: Eus and Eus-fnamentioning
confidence: 99%