1970
DOI: 10.1086/460578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Teaching: A Modest Proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically referred to as “diagnostic teaching” (Prouty & Prillaman, 1970), “precision teaching” (Lindsley, 1971), and “data-based program modification” (Deno & Mirkin, 1977), DBDM refers to the ongoing process of collecting and analyzing student-level data to guide instructional decision making (e.g., Deno & Mirkin, 1977; Fuchs & Fuchs, 1986). The NCII recommends a process for data-based individualization (DBI), derived from DBDM, to support students who need intensive intervention support.…”
Section: Characteristics and Procedures Of Dbdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically referred to as “diagnostic teaching” (Prouty & Prillaman, 1970), “precision teaching” (Lindsley, 1971), and “data-based program modification” (Deno & Mirkin, 1977), DBDM refers to the ongoing process of collecting and analyzing student-level data to guide instructional decision making (e.g., Deno & Mirkin, 1977; Fuchs & Fuchs, 1986). The NCII recommends a process for data-based individualization (DBI), derived from DBDM, to support students who need intensive intervention support.…”
Section: Characteristics and Procedures Of Dbdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What kinds of programs and supports are necessary to help students who lack the academic or social skills necessary for both high school success and preparation for postsecondary education? For example, the role of special education and related services personnel in inclusive efforts has been an issue for more than 40 years (McKenzie et al, 1970; Prouty & Prillaman, 1970; Simonsen et al, 2010). The role of special educators in inclusion may be as coteachers or as consultants to general education teachers.…”
Section: Developing Evidence-based Practices In Transition To Postsecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of testing and placement often can be quite time consuming, while little specific help is taking place in the interim. Placement of a child with mild problems can sometimes unnecessarily label a child and exclude him from more of the mainstream of the school than necessary (Prouty & Prillaman 1970). And unfortunately, sometimes placement of a child for even a small part of his school day in a special education program can, in the mind of some school personnel, shift the major responsibility of remediating the child's problems from the regular classroom teacher to the special education teacher (Newcomer 1977).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%