Meeting the Needs of a Child with Mild Learning Problems

Gilhool, Nancy; Ginn, Ruth

doi:10.1177/002221948201500511

Cited by 2 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, John W. Davis made his opening argument for the defendant state of South Carolina in the Brown case as follows:May it please the Court, if the Court should find for the Negro children here, then I am unable to see how the schools of the state could anymore segregate on the basis of sex, or age, or mental deficiency [emphasis added] . (Gilhool, 2011; Harbaugh, 1973)…”

Section: The Ruling In Brownmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…May it please the Court, if the Court should find for the Negro children here, then I am unable to see how the schools of the state could anymore segregate on the basis of sex, or age, or mental deficiency [emphasis added] . (Gilhool, 2011; Harbaugh, 1973)…”

Section: The Ruling In Brownmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the first persons to comment on the applicability of the Brown ruling to persons with disabilities was Dr. Gunnar Dybwad, the executive director of the National Association of Parents and Friends of Mentally Retarded Children (now the Arc). Dr. Dybwad believed that the Brown ruling had great implications for families and their children with disabilities because these children often had no access to public education (Gilhool, 2011). Attorneys such as Thomas Gilhool and Stanley Herr collaborated with parent advocacy groups to begin filing lawsuits against school districts that excluded children with disabilities using the Brown ruling as a basis for their complaints (Gilhool, 2011).…”

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Dr. Dybwad believed that the Brown ruling had great implications for families and their children with disabilities because these children often had no access to public education (Gilhool, 2011). Attorneys such as Thomas Gilhool and Stanley Herr collaborated with parent advocacy groups to begin filing lawsuits against school districts that excluded children with disabilities using the Brown ruling as a basis for their complaints (Gilhool, 2011).…”

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because the state was using this law to exclude students with intellectual disabilities, officials at the Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) decided to hire a young attorney, Thomas Gilhool, to represent the organization in a class-action lawsuit against Pennsylvania’s exclusionary law. The PARC organization hired Gilhool because PARC officials knew that he had been involved in the civil rights movement in the late 1950s and 1960s (Gilhool, 2011). In PARC v. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , attorney Gilhool based his arguments on the Brown decision, asserting that if the Supreme Court should find for the African American children in Brown , how could states anymore segregate students on the basis of sex, age, or disability (Gilhool, 2011).…”

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Brown v. Board of Education and the Development of Special Education

Yell

2021

Intervention in School and Clinic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

May 2020 was the 66th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. In this case, perhaps the most important ruling of the 20th century, the Supreme Court ruled that the racial segregation of Black children in public schools was unconstitutional. In addition, the ruling in Brown v. Board had a profound effect on the education of children with disabilities. The purpose of this column is to examine the Supreme Court’s ruling and to explore the impact of the rulings on students with disabilities.

show abstract

Section: The Ruling In Brownmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Ruling In Brownmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Brown Ruling and The Right To Education Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Brown v. Board of Education and the Development of Special Education

Yell

2021

Intervention in School and Clinic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resource Specialist Program

Troppmann

Currer

1988

Remedial and Special Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

N AUTOIMMUNE MECHANISM has been invoked in a number of dis-A ease states, such as the connective tissue diseases, chronic thyroiditis, hemolytic anemia, etc. This type of mechanism has been suggested by the occurrence in these diseases of hypergammaglobulinemia, a number of circulating factors with the characteristics of autoantibodies, decreased serum complement levels, and the production, in some instances, of similar lesions in experimental animals utilizing immunologic methods. In the case of antigens believed to be sequestered, exemplified by certain antigens of the eye, thyroid gland, and nerve tissue, autoimmune reactivity has been thought to result from a failure of induction of tolerance to these antigens because they were, presumably, not freely available to the reticulo-endothelial system in the embryonic or neonatal state. In the case of readily available antigens, however, the occurrence of autoimmune reaction must assume the emergence of immunologically competent cells capable of reacting with one or more antigens of the host. The appearance of such cells has been ascribed either to a failure of the tolerance mechanism1 or to the appearance of abnormal populations of immunologically competent cells through a process of mutation.2is Regardless of the mechanism whereby such cells might arise in autoimmune disease states, it is possible to study the consequences of their presence by providing the experimental animals with immunologically competent cells known to be capable of reacting with anti-gens of the host. This has been studied intensively in this laboratory during the past 2 years. Our observations indicate that such animals do, in fact, develop changes in a number of organ systems which are strikingly similar to those of human connective tissue disease. A large literature describes the production of the graft versus host reaction, or homologous disease, by injection of immunologically competent cells into newborn animal^,^-^ F1 hybrid~,~~s irradiated animals: and adult animals rendered tolerant by neonatal injection of lymphoid cells.1° Homologous disease has also been induced in adults by repeated injection of large numbers of lymphoid cells.11 Oliner, Schwartz and Dameshek have studied the hemato-logic changes in homologous disease from the point of view of autoimmune disease, commenting on the similarity of the pancytopenia to that of human disease.12

show abstract

Meeting the Needs of a Child with Mild Learning Problems

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Brown v. Board of Education and the Development of Special Education

Brown v. Board of Education and the Development of Special Education

Resource Specialist Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About