2016
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic imaging and radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 However, retrospective studies have confirmed that both adults and children with CD may have high levels of cumulative exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation, drawing attention to the need for alternative, accurate, radiation-free techniques. [13][14][15][16][17] In view of this, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is now more frequently used to assess pediatric CD, providing an accurate tool to assess disease extent and distribution, depicting both intestinal and extraintestinal disease-related complications. 18 It is favored due to its inherent multiplanar capability and ability to provide excellent soft-tissue contrast resolution without exposure to ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 However, retrospective studies have confirmed that both adults and children with CD may have high levels of cumulative exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation, drawing attention to the need for alternative, accurate, radiation-free techniques. [13][14][15][16][17] In view of this, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is now more frequently used to assess pediatric CD, providing an accurate tool to assess disease extent and distribution, depicting both intestinal and extraintestinal disease-related complications. 18 It is favored due to its inherent multiplanar capability and ability to provide excellent soft-tissue contrast resolution without exposure to ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis is made based on well‐described clinical, endoscopic, histological, radiological and biochemical parameters. Delayed access to cross‐sectional imaging and colonoscopy due to long waiting lists is a significant barrier to early diagnosis and the initiation of medical management . The median duration from the time of symptoms onset to diagnosis has been reported in some series to be up to 24 months .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these patients are young people and require frequent monitoring, considering the course of these disorders; that is why an additional non-invasive, well tolerated and confident diagnostic tool for the assessment of IBD evolution is required. There is no gold standard imagistic technique for the diagnosis and follow-up of IBD, but computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) provide important information regarding intestinal alteration and extraintestinal manifestations [16][17][18]. Abdominal US techniques have the advantage of being radiationsparing, non-invasive, well tolerated, cheap and easily repeated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%