2019
DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of small intestinal contrast ultrasound with magnetic resonance enterography in pediatric Crohn's disease

Abstract: Aim To compare the diagnostic yield of small intestinal contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) with magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) in routine clinical practice in a cohort of pediatric patients investigated for Crohn's disease (CD) attending a UK tertiary center. Methods and Results Patients with suspected or established CD who underwent SICUS were identified retrospectively. SICUS was compared to conventional transabdominal ultrasound (TUS), ileocolonoscopy (IC), and MRE. The accuracy and agreement of SICUS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 42 articles were assessed for eligibility with full text and 31 articles were excluded for the following reasons: (1) no evaluation of diagnostic performance (i.e., evaluation of the correlation between US and MRE, n = 11), (2) no evaluation of both US and MRE (did not consider both US and MRE as imaging modality or reference standard, n = 3), (3) insufficient information to generate a two-by-two table ( n = 3), (4) mixed study population with patients with ulcerative colitis ( n = 4), (5) conference abstract only and no full text available ( n = 8), (6) study presenting sensitivity results alone ( n = 1), and (7) different endpoints for diagnostic performance (i.e., stricture, n = 1). Finally, 11 studies [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] comprising 752 patients evaluating the diagnostic performance of US and/or MRE for active bowel lesions were included ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining 42 articles were assessed for eligibility with full text and 31 articles were excluded for the following reasons: (1) no evaluation of diagnostic performance (i.e., evaluation of the correlation between US and MRE, n = 11), (2) no evaluation of both US and MRE (did not consider both US and MRE as imaging modality or reference standard, n = 3), (3) insufficient information to generate a two-by-two table ( n = 3), (4) mixed study population with patients with ulcerative colitis ( n = 4), (5) conference abstract only and no full text available ( n = 8), (6) study presenting sensitivity results alone ( n = 1), and (7) different endpoints for diagnostic performance (i.e., stricture, n = 1). Finally, 11 studies [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] comprising 752 patients evaluating the diagnostic performance of US and/or MRE for active bowel lesions were included ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of the study design and population are listed in Table 1 . A total of 10 of the 11 studies had a prospective design [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], while only one was a retrospective study [ 20 ] Furthermore, the majority of studies have been conducted in Europe [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. The total number of enrolled patients ranged from 17 to 284.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small-intestine contrast enhanced Ultrasound Sonography (SICUS) has gained importance in different indications of structural bowel diseases. SICUS can be used to describe the contrast behavior of the bowel wall and to exclude possible complications such as abscesses, strictures and fistulas [17,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of stricturing or penetrating phenotypes, small intestine contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (SICUS) performed 30–40 min after the ingestion of 500–750 mL of oral contrast such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) could be very useful in patients with CD, allowing a more accurate characterization of the bowel wall and loops [ 43 ].…”
Section: Small Intestine Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography (Sicus)mentioning
confidence: 99%