2016
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic disagreement between tests of evacuatory function: a prospective study of 100 constipated patients

Abstract: There is considerable disagreement between the results of various tests used to diagnose ED and FDD. This highlights the need for a reappraisal of both diagnostic criteria, and what represents the 'gold standard' investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 10% or fewer women had descent of the bladder base or uterus for 4 cm or more below the pubococcygeal line or a rectocele measuring 4 cm or larger, which suggests that this cutoff is useful for identifying pathological descent or rectoceles. However, even smaller rectoceles may cause symptoms, particularly if they do not empty during defecation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 10% or fewer women had descent of the bladder base or uterus for 4 cm or more below the pubococcygeal line or a rectocele measuring 4 cm or larger, which suggests that this cutoff is useful for identifying pathological descent or rectoceles. However, even smaller rectoceles may cause symptoms, particularly if they do not empty during defecation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, 10 Taken at the extreme, these observations undermine the concept that rectoanal discoordination is responsible for defecatory disorders. Offsetting those concerns, rectal evacuation assessments with anorectal HRM, BET, and MRI were significantly correlated in this study, which substantiates the criterion validity of these tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 The agreement between balloon expulsion and barium defecography is fair and between water perfused anorectal manometry and defecography is poor. 10 Prompted by these observations, the Rome IV criteria recommend at least two abnormal anorectal tests for diagnosing defecatory disorders in constipated patients. 1 These findings also potentially undermine the diagnostic utility of these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frustratingly, however there is no gold standard diagnostic modality for confirming dyssynergic defaecation in patients with chronic constipation. There is also evidence of disparity in results when evaluating between modalities and with each in isolation . Given this, a diagnosis of dyssynergia requires two dynamic tests to be positive including impaired evacuation on balloon expulsion test or defaecography, inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor muscles or incomplete relaxation of the anal sphincter on anorectal manometry, anal surface electromyography or imaging studies (Figure ) …”
Section: Initial Approach For Dyssynergic Defaecationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anorectal manometry indirectly assesses anorectal function by measuring recto‐anal pressures and motor coordination . It evaluates: (1) anal sphincter function (2) recto‐anal reflex activity and (3) changes in anal and rectal pressures during simulated defaecation .…”
Section: Initial Approach For Dyssynergic Defaecationmentioning
confidence: 99%