2017
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic challenges of antrochoanal polyps: A review of sixty‐one cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7.8% of our cases were under the age of 18, coinciding with the results of Segal et al [9]. 80% were diagnosed using CRS, however 8.1% turned out to be inverted papillomas, so the pathological anatomical confirmation is very important due to the different nature of this lesion and its tendency to relapse if not properly removed [10]. No differences have been found in term of gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…7.8% of our cases were under the age of 18, coinciding with the results of Segal et al [9]. 80% were diagnosed using CRS, however 8.1% turned out to be inverted papillomas, so the pathological anatomical confirmation is very important due to the different nature of this lesion and its tendency to relapse if not properly removed [10]. No differences have been found in term of gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…13,15 Antrochoanal polyp may mimic a wide range of pathologies, although certain clinical and radiological features should raise the index of suspicion. 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, an ACP appears as a bright, grey or pinkish mass in the middle meatus and nasal cavity protruding posteriorly to the choana. Computed tomography (CT) can help to assess its nature, showing a soft tissue mass filling the maxillary sinus and growing through the accessory ostium into the middle meatus and the posterior choana 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent recurrence of the disease, it is important to avoid a simple polypectomy and to remove the underlying mucosa at the site of origin of the ACP with minimal interruption of the normal sinus physiology 6 . However, it is not always possible to determine the point of attachment preoperatively due to the presence of coexistent sinonasal mucosal disease 4 , 6 and, consequently, to precisely plan the most suitable surgical approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%