We have demonstrated that NIPF does not correlate with the SNOT-22 disease-specific questionnaire, although both outcomes significantly improve postoperatively. At present, we are still lacking a clinically accurate objective measure of nasal function for the evaluation of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery.
The results show a measured significant improvement in olfaction following functional Septorhinoplasty but not a subjective improvement in the patients perception of their sense of smell and hence not a clinically significant difference. The reasons for the measured improvement are not clear and are likely to be multifactorial.
The Rapid Diagnostic Clinic (RDC) was introduced to comply with NICE recommendations for improving head and neck cancer services (National Institute of Clinical Excellence 2004 Improving outcomes in head and neck cancer: the manual. NICE, London). It provides multi-modality specialist assessment for new referrals, with on-site sonography and cytology. We have critically appraised the efficacy of our RDC, with respect to its impact on patients' timelines and outcomes. A retrospective audit of new referrals to the head and neck clinic during a 6-month period was conducted (pre-RDC period); areas in delay in patients reaching a definitive outcome were identified. Following implementation of the RDC, a second cycle, prospective audit was performed and its impact on timelines for patients' journey and outcomes determined. One hundred and ninety-seven patients were seen during the pre-RDC period. The average time from referral to being seen was 11 days for 2-week wait (2WW) referrals and 34 days for other sources. During the RDC period, 299 patients were seen in total. The average waiting time was reduced to 9 days for 2WW referrals and 23 days for other referrals. During the RDC period, over one-third of patients utilised the provision of ultrasound ± FNAC, and consequently, the majority reached a definitive outcome (discharged or scheduled for surgery) following their first consultation. This was a significant improvement compared to the pre-RDC period, where the main outcome was referral for an investigation, with consequently longer waiting time for surgery. We report the first study to consider the effect of a 'one-stop' clinic on patients' journey timelines and outcomes. Our study has shown that the RDC provides an efficient and effective system, which facilitates the patients' pathway to a definitive management plan.
INTRODUCTIONThe otorhinolaryngology department at Northwick Park Hospital uses the Tristel wipes system for cleaning nasendoscopes in the outpatient clinics. This system uses chlorine dioxide as its only disinfectant. The manufacturer claims the system provides safe sterilisation of nasendoscopes. However, there appear to be no reports in the literature to date that evaluate the efficacy of this system in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 'in use' efficacy of Tristel wipes in decontaminating nasendoscopes and to identify any significant contamination between cleaning and usage. METHODS A total of 31 cleaning episodes were performed. Each cleaning episode included two swabs after cleaning the scopes, one from the tip and the other from the handle. Another two swabs from the same areas were also taken before application to the patient. The microbiology unit evaluated all swabs for bacterial, fungal and mycobacterial growth. RESULTS Overall, 123 swabs from 31 cleaning episodes were tested. None of the swabs taken from the tips (n=31) or handles (n=31) after cleaning with Tristel wipes developed any organism growth. Furthermore, none of the swabs taken from the tip of the scopes before using on patients (n=31) developed any growth. Of the 31 swabs taken from the handle before use, 3 developed significant staphylococcal growth. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the 'in use' efficacy of Tristel wipes in cleaning the scopes of bacteria, fungi and mycobacteria was 100%. Attention to hand hygiene and the use of gloves should be considered when handling the cleaned scopes to minimise the risk of contamination between cleaning and application to patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.