2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of small intestine ultrasonography using an oral contrast agent in Crohn’s disease: Comparative study from the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated radiation dose may have been greater or less than true exposure as standardised published doses were used. This study was conducted at a single centre and as such may not reflect wider practice; in particular, our centre has an interest in the use of white cell scans and small bowel ultrasound , both of which may have impacted on total radiation exposure. Although the centre functions as a tertiary centre, an attempt was made to reflect practice in secondary centres by selecting only those patients referred directly from primary care, but we accept this remains a potential bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated radiation dose may have been greater or less than true exposure as standardised published doses were used. This study was conducted at a single centre and as such may not reflect wider practice; in particular, our centre has an interest in the use of white cell scans and small bowel ultrasound , both of which may have impacted on total radiation exposure. Although the centre functions as a tertiary centre, an attempt was made to reflect practice in secondary centres by selecting only those patients referred directly from primary care, but we accept this remains a potential bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of SICUS for the detection of active small bowel CD was 93% and 99% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 98% and a negative predictive value of 95%. furthermore, there was substantial agreement between SICUS and histology obtained at ileocolonoscopy or surgery (k = 0.62) [50] . SICUS may also have a role to play in the preoperative assessment of CD.…”
Section: Trans-abdominal Us and Small Intestine Contrastenhanced Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both conventional US and SICUS had a higher diagnostic accuracy than SBE in detecting fistulas, using intra-operative findings as the gold standard [49] . More recently, a United Kingdom-based study of 143 patients with suspected or known CD, found SICUS to have a similar diagnostic yield compared to SBfT and CT (k coefficient 0.88 and 0.91 respectively) for the detection of features of small bowel CD in routine clinical practice [50] . The sensitivity and specificity of SICUS for the detection of active small bowel CD was 93% and 99% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 98% and a negative predictive value of 95%.…”
Section: Trans-abdominal Us and Small Intestine Contrastenhanced Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Qualitative assessment includes identification of particular patterns of enhancement, such as submucosal or transmural enhancement that may reflect disease activity, with low or absent enhancement alternatively suggesting quiescent disease . Furthermore, software may generate time–intensity enhancement curves, providing semiquantitative variables such as maximal enhancement, time‐to‐peak enhancement, and the area under a time–intensity curve . Such analysis is relatively onerous for widespread clinical adoption, but is of significant research interest.…”
Section: Small Bowel Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%