2015
DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in providing a diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy among HIV-infected patients

Abstract: Background: Opportunistic infections and malignancies cause lymphadenopathy in HIV-infected patients. The use and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing of cervical lymphadenopathy among HIV-infected patients is not well studied in Uganda. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in providing a diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy among HIV-infected patients in Uganda. Methods: We consecutively recruited adult HIV-infected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11] In a study of HIV infected patients, FNAC predicted the histological findings in 65 out of 73 cases (89%) and missed 7 cases (9.5%), with a sensitivity of 93.1%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 78.7% for tuberculosis. 12 In the present study, sensitivity of FNAC in diagnosing granulomatous diseases, lymphoid neoplasm and metastatic malignancies were found to be between 45-88%, after exclusion of non-representative and inadequate FNACs. The sensitivity of diagnosis of granulomatous disease in FNAC was only 45.83%, which increases to 70.03% if necrosis is accepted as a surrogate marker of granulomatous disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[8][9][10][11] In a study of HIV infected patients, FNAC predicted the histological findings in 65 out of 73 cases (89%) and missed 7 cases (9.5%), with a sensitivity of 93.1%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 78.7% for tuberculosis. 12 In the present study, sensitivity of FNAC in diagnosing granulomatous diseases, lymphoid neoplasm and metastatic malignancies were found to be between 45-88%, after exclusion of non-representative and inadequate FNACs. The sensitivity of diagnosis of granulomatous disease in FNAC was only 45.83%, which increases to 70.03% if necrosis is accepted as a surrogate marker of granulomatous disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We found the accuracy of FNAC for TL to be good, with a sensitivity of 96.77% (97.44%) and a specificity of 100%. In the literature, the specificity and sensitivity of FNAC in the diagnosis of TL vary widely, from 43 to 100% [6,22,23]. This may be explained by the differences from 1 series to another in the criteria established for TL diagnosis: granuloma with caseation necrosis versus only granuloma or caseation necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FNAC is definitively useful tool in establishing diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis [13]. It is minimally invasive, faster and cheaper when compared to excision biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is minimally invasive, faster and cheaper when compared to excision biopsy. FNAC has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting tuberculosis with sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 100% [13]. Cytological criteria include clusters of epitheloid cells with or without necrotic debris, mature lymphocytes and pleomorphic lymphoid cells [14], [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%