2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0366-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Abstract: FDG PET may detect recurrent ovarian cancer earlier than CIM, with higher sensitivity and even higher diagnostic accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10] And the sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT are 93.3-97.4% and 80-100%, respectively. [11,12] A recent meta-analysis of 29 studies demonstrated that PET-CT had high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (90%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] And the sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT are 93.3-97.4% and 80-100%, respectively. [11,12] A recent meta-analysis of 29 studies demonstrated that PET-CT had high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (90%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET were 87%, 79%, 85%, 92%, and 68%, respectively, compared with 53%, 82%, 61%, 89%, and 39%, respectively, for conventional imaging and 58%, 94%, and 67%, respectively, for CA-125 measurements (50). In 23 of 55 patients with positive serum CA-125 levels but negative conventional imaging findings, 18 F-FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed.…”
Section: Detection Of Recurrent or Metastatic Diseasementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Twelve full-text studies constituted the evidence base for t he present g u ideline : one rct of c a125 i n fol low-up 15 ; five retrospective cohort studies on methods of detection [16][17][18][19][20] ; two pilot studies 21,22 ; and four qualitative or observational studies of psychosocial concerns, health care provider and patient preferences or satisfaction, and patterns of care [23][24][25][26] . Eleven of those studies fell within the scope of our guideline; one study about sexual symptomatology was out-of-scope 22 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%