“…The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET were 87%, 79%, 85%, 92%, and 68%, respectively, compared with 53%, 82%, 61%, 89%, and 39%, respectively, for conventional imaging and 58%, 94%, and 67%, respectively, for CA-125 measurements (50). In 23 of 55 patients with positive serum CA-125 levels but negative conventional imaging findings, 18 F-FDG PET was positive and relapse was confirmed.…”