2018
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s161382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of droplet digital PCR for detection of EGFR T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA

Abstract: ObjectivesAlthough different methods have been established to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a wide range of diagnostic accuracy values were reported in previous studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide pooled diagnostic accuracy measures for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in the diagnosis of EGFR T790M mutation based on ctDNA.Materials and methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out based on resources from Pubmed, Web… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular methods such as ddPCR and NGS-based techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages, separately. ddPCR is associated with high analytical sensitivity down to single molecules and has lower turnaround time than NGS-based approaches when testing single mutations only, 39,40 but the main disadvantages included sequential testing of mutations and detection of previously unknown mutations is impossible. 18 In contrast, NGS-targeted sequencing method utilises enrichment of recurrently altered loci by PCR amplification or hybrid capture, allowing de novo identification of molecular alterations, but this inevitably introduces random errors in the amplification process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular methods such as ddPCR and NGS-based techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages, separately. ddPCR is associated with high analytical sensitivity down to single molecules and has lower turnaround time than NGS-based approaches when testing single mutations only, 39,40 but the main disadvantages included sequential testing of mutations and detection of previously unknown mutations is impossible. 18 In contrast, NGS-targeted sequencing method utilises enrichment of recurrently altered loci by PCR amplification or hybrid capture, allowing de novo identification of molecular alterations, but this inevitably introduces random errors in the amplification process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a recent meta-analysis of 11 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) studies showed that ddPCR displays a good performance for the detection of EGFR T790M mutation in ctDNA samples from a total of 872 advanced NSCLC patients. In particular, the overall concordance between plasma and tissue estimation was 81.2%, while the pooled analysis revealed that ddPCR test performs with 86.9% (95% CI, 80.6%–91.7%) of specificity and 70.1% (95% CI, 62.7%–76.7%) of sensitivity in detecting the T790M EGFR mutation in ctDNA samples from NSCLC patients [84]. Other similar studies were performed involving oral cancer patients [85], breast cancer patients [86], chronic myelogenous leukemia patients [87], and others.…”
Section: Ngs Ddpcr and Liquid Biopsy For Ctdna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although patients with cancer usually have higher average plasma/serum levels of ctDNA, they are often present in fragmented form at very low concentrations 8 . Digital PCR (dPCR) is the third generation and the most advanced PCR technique that permits highly sensitive genotyping and absolute quantification of mutant copies in ctDNA 9,10 . While dPCR is highly accurate, it is cost-intensive, time consuming, and requires sophisticated instruments and trained personnel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%