2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy in patients with lymphedema: A retrospective cohort analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2000, a modality was added to the diagnosis tools for lymphedema called BIS which measures the volume of extracellular fluid via detecting a physical reaction to an impressed electrical current (65). In comparison to conventional methods, the measurement of BIS is more objective and specific (80-99%) (66-69), with a wide range of sensitivity (30-100%) (66-70), but a higher false-negative rate (36%) (71). Notably, BIS permits identification of lymphedema earlier, when it is in the subclinical stage, and tracks disease progression persistently, making timely intervention of lymphedema a reality (72).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2000, a modality was added to the diagnosis tools for lymphedema called BIS which measures the volume of extracellular fluid via detecting a physical reaction to an impressed electrical current (65). In comparison to conventional methods, the measurement of BIS is more objective and specific (80-99%) (66-69), with a wide range of sensitivity (30-100%) (66-70), but a higher false-negative rate (36%) (71). Notably, BIS permits identification of lymphedema earlier, when it is in the subclinical stage, and tracks disease progression persistently, making timely intervention of lymphedema a reality (72).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early-stage lymphoscintigraphy is an effective diagnostic tool; however, it has many disadvantages such as radiation exposure, low resolution, high costs and increased invasiveness (1). Lymphography is a newer, systematic method to evaluate limb edema and lymph circulation without radiation exposure (71). Lymphography has higher specificity and sensitivity, and longer tracking capabilities, ranging from subclinical to more advanced stages, compared with lymphoscintigraphy (77,(80)(81)(82).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BIS has only been found to have modest correlation to Perometer, with one study finding R = 0.60 [ 31 ]. In addition, there have been reports that BIS has a false-negative rate of over 30% when compared to directly imaging lymphatic vessels using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography [ 32 ]. There are also several emerging modalities that allow for the direct imaging of lymphatic vessels to detect abnormalities [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioimpedence spectroscopy is another diagnostic tool that measures fluid content in tissues by measuring an extremity's resistance to an electrical current. However, in a retrospective cohort study, researchers found that indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was a more accurate tool for diagnosing lymphedema . With lymphography, near‐infrared fluorescence imaging allows for real‐time imaging of lymph flow.…”
Section: Lymphedemamentioning
confidence: 99%