2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Student’s Misconception on Momentum and Impulse Trough Inquiry Learning with Computer Simulation (ILCS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis 1 Students' conceptions are categorized based on six categories of conceptions, Sound Understanding (SU), Partial Positive (PP), Partial Negative (PN), Misconception (MC), No Understanding (NU), and No Coding (NC). This category is a combination of the level of understanding by Coştu (2008), scoring by Kaltakci-Gurel, Eryilmaz, & McDermott (2017), and concept category by Amalia et al (2019). The level of understanding consists of Sound Understanding (SU), Partial Understanding (PU), Partial Understanding with Specific Misconception (PUSM), Specific Misconceptions (SM), and No Understanding (NU).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis 1 Students' conceptions are categorized based on six categories of conceptions, Sound Understanding (SU), Partial Positive (PP), Partial Negative (PN), Misconception (MC), No Understanding (NU), and No Coding (NC). This category is a combination of the level of understanding by Coştu (2008), scoring by Kaltakci-Gurel, Eryilmaz, & McDermott (2017), and concept category by Amalia et al (2019). The level of understanding consists of Sound Understanding (SU), Partial Understanding (PU), Partial Understanding with Specific Misconception (PUSM), Specific Misconceptions (SM), and No Understanding (NU).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some instruments among them Force Concept Inventory (FCI) by Hestenes, Wells, & Swackhamer (1992), Electromagnetics Concept Inventory (EMCI) by Notaros (2002). Wave Diagnostic Instrument (WADI) by Caleon & Subramaniam (2010), Astronomy Concept Test (ACT) by Kanli (2015), Four-Tier Geometrical Optics Test (FTGOT) by Kaltakci-Gurel, Eryilmaz, & McDermott (2017), Three tier Force Concept Inventory (T-FCI) by Fratiwi, Ramalis, & Samsudin (2019), Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIFT) by Amalia, Suhendi, Kaniawati, Samsudin, Fratiwi, Hidayat, Zulfikar, Sholihat, Jubaedah, Setyadin, Purwanto, Muhaimin, Bhakti, & Afif (2019). However, diagnostic instruments in light wave material are rarely found, because most of them focus on geometrical optics in addition to the discussion of light as waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] have identified some factors that contribute to the emergence of misconceptions in physics. First, these studies point to students' low comprehension of physical concepts, and their tendency to memorize formulas and concepts without really understanding them [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. This results in a limited ability to analyze problems, and difficulties when establishing relationships between quantities and formulas.…”
Section: Causes and Effects Generated By Misconceptions In Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that students' intuition is often wrong [65]. Sometimes, they have difficulty abstracting concepts properly [67,68]. Likewise, forgetting concepts or retaining them weakly, which are influenced by the opinions of their peers, also contribute to the development of misconceptions in the learning of physics [68].…”
Section: Causes and Effects Generated By Misconceptions In Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on student ideas about linear momentum has primarily been misconceptions-oriented, contributing to KSI by identifying student misconceptions or difficulties in learning about momentum. For example, the literature reports that students: (1) tend to treat momentum as a scalar quantity [2][3][4][5][6][7], (2) think about momentum as dependent on either velocity or mass, but not both [2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12]; and (3) misunderstand or have difficulty applying conservation reasoning, in some cases using "compensation reasoning," treating the velocity of an object as though it "adjusts" to maintain a constant momentum [3,[5][6][7][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%