1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1755-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Rabies Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In many samples it was not possible to isolate the virus in cells because of bacterial contamination, especially when the materials were removed from animals that were found dead. In cases of positive isolation in cells, 96 hours of observation were enough, thus confi rming the data of Webster & Casey, 24 who established that four days was the ideal time period for isolating the rabies virus, especially from samples with low viral titers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 In many samples it was not possible to isolate the virus in cells because of bacterial contamination, especially when the materials were removed from animals that were found dead. In cases of positive isolation in cells, 96 hours of observation were enough, thus confi rming the data of Webster & Casey, 24 who established that four days was the ideal time period for isolating the rabies virus, especially from samples with low viral titers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…24 The small differences observed in the present study in relation to the time taken for mortality may have resulted from differences in viral load in the brain and salivary glands, presence of neutralizing antibodies in the tissue suspensions used as inocula, or high ambient temperature in the vivarium, which may have infl uenced the start of clinical signs, diminished the mortality and increased the frequency of abortive infection in the inoculated animals. 24 As shown in Table 4, the minimum time taken for mortality for the brain and salivary gland material from bats with different feeding habits was less than 21 days. The nine-day reduction in the daily observation of these animals may signify a saving in the expenditure on maintenance and on carrying out this test, in comparison with the conventional 30 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This was done to remove animals that might have been incubating rabies or were clinically rabid because vaccination would not work on those animals. Brain samples were removed and submitted for rabies testing (using a fluorescent antibody test) (Webster and Casey, 1988) at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Laboratory Fallowfield, in Nepean, Ontario. Raccoon density was estimated using a catch/ unit effort model as noted in Krebs (1989).…”
Section: Tvr Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All rabid animal brain specimens used were selected from submissions made to the Rabies Unit of the Animal Diseases Research Institute NEPEAN for diagnosis over a 2 year period (January 1990 to January 1992) and had been diagnosed as rabies-positive by the immunofluorescent staining technique (Webster & Casey, 1988 Preparation of RNA. For the ERA strain, viral RNA was recovered from nucleocapsid material prepared according to Webster & Casey (1988). For street virus isolates, total tissue RNA was isolated from approximately 0-5 g of brain material.…”
Section: Sources Of Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%