1993
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90521-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal contrast echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is notable variability between different observers in the detection of PFO unless the TEE technique and the criteria of PFO have been standardized. 29 Also, the correct performance of VM is of vital importance for optimal results. The results may remain false-negative in patients who are not able to perform VM properly either because of a neurological disability or because of intolerance of the probe in the esophagus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is notable variability between different observers in the detection of PFO unless the TEE technique and the criteria of PFO have been standardized. 29 Also, the correct performance of VM is of vital importance for optimal results. The results may remain false-negative in patients who are not able to perform VM properly either because of a neurological disability or because of intolerance of the probe in the esophagus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was assessed at 90 days by a stroke-trained physician or stroke study nurse certified in mRS via in-person or phone interview. 15,16 We defined academic months as well as 4 academic quarters (3 months each) with the first academic month starting on July 1 st and the first academic quarter ranging from July through September 2013 to determine whether the ED-LOS varied over the course of the academic year. To determine whether the time of patient presentation to the ED was associated with the ED-LOS or outcome we stratified the time to presentation into 7AM-3PM, 3PM-11PM, and 11PM to 7 AM shifts, which most closely represent both neurology and ED staff shifts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Findings that argue against the association between PFO and cryptogenic stroke include the high prevalence of PFO in all subtypes of stroke 27 and the low likelihood of finding a source of thrombus for paradoxical embolism in stroke patients with PFO ( Table 2). [23][24][25][30][31][32][33] In addition, small (Ͻ1-2 mm) clots that are beyond the resolution of TEE transducers may be missed, and migration or lysis of clots can occur before diagnostic imaging has been performed. These confounding factors underscore the difficulties in establishing a cause-effect relationship between PFO and paradoxical embolism.…”
Section: Association Of Pfo and Strokementioning
confidence: 99%