2001
DOI: 10.1128/cmr.14.1.15-37.2001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Noncultivatable Gastroenteritis Viruses, the Human Caliciviruses

Abstract: Gastroenteritis is one of the most common illnesses of humans, and many different viruses have been causally associated with this disease. Of those enteric viruses that have been established as etiologic agents of gastroenteritis, only the human caliciviruses cannot be cultivated in vitro. The cloning of Norwalk virus and subsequently of other human caliciviruses has led to the development of several new diagnostic assays. Antigen detection enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) using polyclonal hyperimmune animal sera an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
183
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 247 publications
0
183
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct EM is not a very sensitive technique with a detection limit of 10 6 particles per ml of stool for enteric viruses [29]. Compared to SaVs, NoVs do not have the distinctive calicivirus morphology (cupshaped surface depressions) and they are harder to differentiate from other small round viruses including enteroviruses, astroviruses and picornaviruses in stool specimens [6,66].…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Direct EM is not a very sensitive technique with a detection limit of 10 6 particles per ml of stool for enteric viruses [29]. Compared to SaVs, NoVs do not have the distinctive calicivirus morphology (cupshaped surface depressions) and they are harder to differentiate from other small round viruses including enteroviruses, astroviruses and picornaviruses in stool specimens [6,66].…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primers mainly determine the specificity of the RT-PCR reactions. Although nested RT-PCR can increase sensitivity up to 10-1,000 times, it is less used because of the high risk of cross-contamination [29]. Real-time RT-PCR is more sensitive and it has become an alternative method for detection of low amounts of virus, especially from environmental samples [69,70].…”
Section: Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations