2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-39842013000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of hepatic steatosis by contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of abdominal computed tomography in the assessment of hepatic steatosis using the portal phase with a simplified calculation method as compared with the non-contrast-enhanced phase. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 150 patients were retrospectively evaluated by means of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. One hundred patients had hepatic steatosis and 50 were control subjects. For the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are several criteria for the assessment of hepatic steatosis by computed tomography (CT), most consider that an attenuation value of ≤ 40 Hounsfield units (HU), measured in the region of interest (ROI), commonly in the right hepatic lobe in the non-enhanced phase, demonstrates a correlation with a pathological fat content of ≥ 30%, suggesting at least moderate hepatic steatosis [12][13][14]. Another important evaluation criterion is the comparison with the ROI in the splenic parenchyma: when the liver attenuation is at least 10 HU less than that of the spleen, steatosis is considered.…”
Section: Ct Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are several criteria for the assessment of hepatic steatosis by computed tomography (CT), most consider that an attenuation value of ≤ 40 Hounsfield units (HU), measured in the region of interest (ROI), commonly in the right hepatic lobe in the non-enhanced phase, demonstrates a correlation with a pathological fat content of ≥ 30%, suggesting at least moderate hepatic steatosis [12][13][14]. Another important evaluation criterion is the comparison with the ROI in the splenic parenchyma: when the liver attenuation is at least 10 HU less than that of the spleen, steatosis is considered.…”
Section: Ct Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important evaluation criterion is the comparison with the ROI in the splenic parenchyma: when the liver attenuation is at least 10 HU less than that of the spleen, steatosis is considered. Non-enhanced CT has a sensitivity to steatosis ranging from 43 to 95% and a specificity from 90 to 100% [13,15,16].…”
Section: Ct Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian radiological literature has recently highlighted the relevance of imaging methods in the diagnosis of the digestive system diseases ( 1 - 12 ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resonance has been considered a more effective noninvasive method, however, it is an expensive procedure and still not very accessible. Therefore, the most commonly used method for diagnosis of abdominal diseases is tomography [21] . In addition to these methods, hepatic biopsy can also be done and in this way there are several levels of liver involvement in NAFLD [22] .…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%