2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03518.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection: Noninvasive Methods Compared To Invasive Methods and Evaluation of Two New Tests

Abstract: Most tests had sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values >90%. The noninvasive tests are accurate for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Helicoblot 2.1 performed as well as the best ELISA kit. The HpSA is a promising direct noninvasive test that can be applied easily to evaluate H. pylori status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported to be 82-90% sensitive and 99-100% specifi c to diagnose HP infection [12,[14][15][16]. Our fi nding of an 89.8% sensitivity and a 100% specifi city is in accordance with these fi gures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported to be 82-90% sensitive and 99-100% specifi c to diagnose HP infection [12,[14][15][16]. Our fi nding of an 89.8% sensitivity and a 100% specifi city is in accordance with these fi gures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is well known that in daily practice, a combination of tests is recommended and the simultaneous positivity of at least two different tests may therefore be considered diagnostic for HP presence and therefore a gold standard for the detection of HP infection [11,12]. Various invasive and noninvasive methods had previously been compared for the diagnosis of HP infection, but, to our knowledge, ours is the fi rst study to compare Heliprobe UBT with RUT, PCR, and histopathological examination [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were evaluated at least eight weeks after the treatment to assess the success of treatment by control endoscopy, urea breath test or HP stool antigen test. Both of these tests have been reported to have similar results with sensitivity and specificity rates over 90% (50). Therefore, these differences did not influence our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The subjects were screened for H. pylori infection using the 13 C-urea breath test. As a screening test, the 13 C-urea breath test has high sensitivity and specificity [13][14][15][16][17]. A written, informed consent was obtained from all the volunteers prior to the isotopic studies.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%