2019
DOI: 10.1111/eve.13120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis, management and prognosis of large colon impactions

Abstract: The majority of large colon feed impactions occur in the left ventral colon at the pelvic flexure. Sand and enterolith impactions most commonly occur in the left ventral colon at the pelvic flexure or in the right dorsal colon; however, sand can accumulate anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. Enteral fluid therapy can, in most cases, supplement or even replace i.v. administration of fluids and it appears effective and safe to soften large colon contents and resolve simple large colon impactions. Surgical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, teniotomy or enema with lubricants and water may be used to facilitate enterolith mobilisation to bowel segments that can be more easily accessed. Mobilisation manoeuvres may cause intestinal perforation (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021; Hassel & Yarbrough, 1998; Klohnen, 2013; Schumacher & Mair, 2002) and increase the risk of adhesion formation (Hopster‐Iversen et al, 2011; Smith et al, 2005; Van Hoogmoed & Snyder, 1997). In this study, mobilisation manoeuvres were limited to cases of partial obstruction in which enteroliths were not stuck to the intestinal wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, teniotomy or enema with lubricants and water may be used to facilitate enterolith mobilisation to bowel segments that can be more easily accessed. Mobilisation manoeuvres may cause intestinal perforation (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021; Hassel & Yarbrough, 1998; Klohnen, 2013; Schumacher & Mair, 2002) and increase the risk of adhesion formation (Hopster‐Iversen et al, 2011; Smith et al, 2005; Van Hoogmoed & Snyder, 1997). In this study, mobilisation manoeuvres were limited to cases of partial obstruction in which enteroliths were not stuck to the intestinal wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the inclusion of mucosa within descending colon enterotomies has not been determined to be essential (Beard et al, 1989), it does appear to be advantageous to compress submucosal vessels for the large colon (Doyle et al, 2003). Since intramural or submucosal haematomas can occur spontaneously in the descending colon (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021; Schumacher & Mair, 2002), full‐thickness closure of descending colon enterotomies appears prudent as well. While lumen diameter is not limiting for closure of right dorsal colon enterotomies, it is important to be precise with conservative suture bite sizes and minimal inversion when closing descending colon enterotomies.…”
Section: Right Dorsal Colon or Descending Colon Enterotomy Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails using intraluminal lavage through a pelvic flexure enterotomy to evacuate all ingesta oral to the obstruction (right dorsal colon, including ampulla coli, and oral transverse colon, as applicable). Once the colon is emptied of ingesta, water distension of the colon combined with gentle ballottement of the obstruction can free it from the mucosa and allow it to move orally into the ampulla coli where it then can be manipulated within the dorsal colon and exteriorised from the abdomen (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021; Hassel, 2002; Oreff et al, 2020; Pierce, 2009). This author has observed on some occasions that the transverse colon appears to spasm orally to obstructions in the transverse colon, and this spasming does not consistently relax with fluid distension.…”
Section: Resolution Of Intraluminal Obstructions Through Ventral Midl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations