Diagnosis and clinical use of bromperidol in HIV-related psychoses in a sample of seropositive patients with brain damage

Perretta, P.; Nisita, C.; Zaccagnini, Edoardo; Scasso, A; Nuccorini, A.; Santa, M. Della; Cassano, Giovanni Battista

doi:10.1097/00004850-199207020-00006

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead of an explicit definition, authors often defined the term using examples. Psychotic symptoms are most frequently hallucinations and delusions or more specifically, auditory hallucinations and delusions . Others only directly referred to delusions or hallucinations .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Others only directly referred to delusions or hallucinations . Thought disorder, paranoia, illusions, ideas of reference, misidentification, disorganization, bizarre or disorganized behavior, psychomotor disorder, behavioral changes, and depersonalization and derealization were also included.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[195][196][197][198] Others only directly referred to delusions 199,200 or hallucinations. 201 Thought disorder, 97,131,145,156,161,165,167,169,184,189,[192][193][194]196,197,202 paranoia, 100,109,144,167,203 illusions, 100,144,168 ideas of reference, 118 misidentification, 122,134,157 disorganization, 123 bizarre or disorganized behavior, 156,161,165,184,185,189,191,193 psychomotor disorder, 165,184,193 behavioral changes, 159 and depersonalization and derealization 160 were also included.…”

Section: Common Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Terminology and assessment tools of psychosis: A systematic narrative review

Seiler

Nguyen

Yung

et al. 2020

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Phenomena within the psychosis continuum that varies in frequency/duration/intensity have been increasingly identified. Different terms describe these phenomena, however there is no standardization within the terminology. This review evaluated the definitions and assessment tools of seven terms – (i) ‘psychotic experiences’; (ii) ‘psychotic‐like experiences’; (iii) ‘psychotic‐like symptoms’; (iv) ‘attenuated psychotic symptoms’; (v) ‘prodromal psychotic symptoms’; (vi) ‘psychotic symptomatology’; and (vii) ‘psychotic symptoms’. Methods EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched during February–March 2019. Inclusion criteria included 1989–2019, full text, human, and English. Papers with no explicit definition or assessment tool, duplicates, conference abstracts, systematic reviews, meta‐analyses, or no access were excluded. Results A total of 2238 papers were identified and of these, 627 were included. Definitions and assessment tools varied, but some trends were found. Psychotic experiences and psychotic‐like experiences were transient and mild, found in the general population and those at‐risk. Psychotic‐like symptoms were subthreshold and among at‐risk populations and non‐psychotic mental disorders. Attenuated psychotic symptoms were subthreshold but associated with distress, risk, and help‐seeking. Prodromal psychotic symptoms referred to the prodrome of psychotic disorders. Psychotic symptomatology included delusions and hallucinations within psychotic disorders. Psychotic symptoms was the broadest term, encompassing a range of populations but most commonly involving hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, and disorganization. Discussion A model for conceptualizing the required terms is proposed and future directions needed to advance this field of research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Common Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Terminology and assessment tools of psychosis: A systematic narrative review

Seiler

Nguyen

Yung

et al. 2020

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One large case history series found that patients with manic psychosis showed more improvement than patients with schizophreniform psychosis (315). The two clinical trials (31,444) found that positive symptoms responded better than negative symptoms. Across studies the subjects, who largely had advanced HIV disease, required lower doses of antipsychotic medication, similar to the pattern seen in the elderly.…”

Section: Psychotic Disordersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With HIV/AIDS

APA Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Comprehensive Guidelines and Guideline Watches

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) Practice Guidelines are not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all clinical data available for an individual patient and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and practice patterns evolve. These parameters of practice should be considered guidelines only. Adherence to them will not ensure a successful outcome for every individual, nor should they be interpreted as including all proper methods of care or excluding other acceptable methods of care aimed at the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding a particular clinical procedure or treatment plan must be made by the psychiatrist in light of the clinical data presented by the patient and the diagnostic and treatment options available.This practice guideline has been developed by psychiatrists who are in active clinical practice. In addition, some contributors are primarily involved in research or other academic endeavors. It is possible that through such activities some contributors, including work group members and reviewers, have received income related to treatments discussed in this guideline. A number of mechanisms are in place to minimize the potential for producing biased recommendations due to conflicts of interest. Work group members are selected on the basis of their expertise and integrity. Any work group member or reviewer who has a potential conflict of interest that may bias (or appear to bias) his or her work is asked to disclose this to the Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines and the work group. Iterative guideline drafts are reviewed by the Steering Committee, other experts, allied organizations, APA members, and the APA Assembly and Board of Trustees; substantial revisions address or integrate the comments of these multiple reviewers. The development of the APA practice guidelines is not financially supported by any commercial organization.More detail about mechanisms in place to minimize bias is provided in a document available from the APA Department of Quality Improvement and Psychiatric Services, "APA Guideline Development Process."This practice guideline was approved in July 2000 and published in November 2000.

show abstract