2013
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13x663244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing type 2 diabetes and identifying high-risk individuals using the new glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] The challenge is to prevent complications associated with IFG of which ∼30% will remain undiagnosed for a significant period of time. [5] The International Diabetes Federation have recognized the importance of the traditional biomarkers (general biochemistry): blood glucose (BGL), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and lipid studies along with life style improvement and drug treatment regimens to combat T2DM and CVD. There is also a recognition that lower blood glucose levels (<7.8 mmol/l) have lower rates of all major end point diabetic complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] The challenge is to prevent complications associated with IFG of which ∼30% will remain undiagnosed for a significant period of time. [5] The International Diabetes Federation have recognized the importance of the traditional biomarkers (general biochemistry): blood glucose (BGL), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and lipid studies along with life style improvement and drug treatment regimens to combat T2DM and CVD. There is also a recognition that lower blood glucose levels (<7.8 mmol/l) have lower rates of all major end point diabetic complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 The potential benefits of the HbA 1c test include it being a non-fasting blood test, less inter-test variability and its ability to provide an indication of longer-term hyperglycaemia (over 6-8 weeks). 29 A HbA 1c level of ≥ 48 mmol/l (6.5%) is suggestive of T2DM, whereas a level of 42-47 mmol/l (6.0-6.4%) is suggestive of IGR or a high risk of diabetes. 27 Further details on the methods used to identify T2DM and IGR for this programme of research are provided in Chapter 5 (see Outcomes) and Chronic conditions are becoming increasingly important for people with ID as their life expectancy increases.…”
Section: Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This two-stage approach initially involves an assessment using a computer based validated risk assessment score (Leicester or Cambridge) of all persons over 40 years (and those over 25 years in known high risk groups). The Leicester group, 7 in this issue of the BJGP offers a practical scheme for doing this in a busy general practice, a process greatly simplified by the use of risk assessment scores, and measurement of HbA1c rather than fasting blood glucose tests. People identified as being in the top 50% of diabetes risk using a computer-based risk assessment tool, can be opportunistically offered a HbA1c test to identify those with diabetes and those at high risk who require intensive structured lifestyle intervention and annual HbA1c monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%