2000
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-200011000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Childhood Acetabular Dysplasia Using the Lateral Margin of the Sourcil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitani et al 21 reported a satisfactory outcome in only 67% of patients treated with the harness and no addi- 19 reported that a minimum centre-edge angle of 10˚ at five or six years of age may be a reasonable threshold of normality. However, Kim et al 27 reported that the centre-edge angle is only useful in children over the age of five years because the Anteroposterior radiograph in a five-year-old girl with bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip treated with the Pavlik harness. The acetabular index was 34˚ on the right and 39˚ on the left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitani et al 21 reported a satisfactory outcome in only 67% of patients treated with the harness and no addi- 19 reported that a minimum centre-edge angle of 10˚ at five or six years of age may be a reasonable threshold of normality. However, Kim et al 27 reported that the centre-edge angle is only useful in children over the age of five years because the Anteroposterior radiograph in a five-year-old girl with bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip treated with the Pavlik harness. The acetabular index was 34˚ on the right and 39˚ on the left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiological follow-up was carried out every 6 to 12 months after the initial treatment and the plain radiograph taken a mean age of 4.9 years (3 to 7) was used to evaluate the indications for additional surgery. The acetabular index (AI) 26,27 was used as the basic indicator of residual acetabular dysplasia. Periodic examination was continued for patients with an AI < 30˚ (harness-only group), and additional surgery was indicated for those with an AI of 30˚ or more (supplementary group) ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a plain radiograph cannot always be of reliable standard because of pelvic malposition during the acquisition of radiograph as well as inaccurate centralization of the X-ray beam [6][7][8]. In addition, the imprecise location of the superolateral part of the acetabulum may contribute to the measurement error [9]. The variance of AI measurement and pelvic orientation is greater in younger children who are incapable of cooperation during the examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sourcil is a curved area of dense bone on the weight‐bearing surface of the acetabulum. Difficulty in identification of the medial margin of the sourcil to measure acetabular depth reportedly contributes to low repeatability of the AI in children 28 . AI was not highly repeatable in the most ages evaluated in this investigation in canine hips; however, the source of the difficulty in AI measurement was not likely because of identification of the sourcil in this case, because other measures that relied on identification of the landmark, the HTEA and CPC, were highly repeatable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%