Abstract:The Boteti palaeo‐estuary in northern Botswana is located where the endoreic Boteti river, an overflow from the regional Okavango river system, enters the Makgadikgadi pans. The present work considers diagenetic silica and calcium carbonate dominated transformations. The aims are to help identify precursor conditions for the origin of microcrystalline silcrete–calcrete intergrade deposits while developing insight into pene‐contemporaneous silica and calcite matrix formation. General precursor conditions requir… Show more
“…Composition and mineralogy of host sediments in the Okavango system The mineralogy of the surface sediments across the entire area covered by the Kalahari Group is dominated by quartz, with small amounts of fine-grained calcite and dolomite, clays (kaolinite, illite, smectite) and feldspars (plagioclase, microcline and K-feldspar) (McCarthy et al, 1991;McCarthy and Ellery, 1995;Chatupa and Direng, 2000;Huntsman-Mapila et al, 2005;Ringrose et al, 2014). The heavy minerals present vary according to the mineralogy of (often deeply) underlying bedrock: zircon, ilmenite, tourmaline, staurolite, kyanite, epidote, zoisite, andalusite, apatite, brookite, rutile, sillimanite, sphene, amphibole and garnet (Moore and Dingle, 1998;Nuumbembe, 2016).…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Okavango River presently delivers an estimated 360 000 tonnes of solutes to the Okavango Delta per year, ~50% of which can be dissolved silica, with concentrations up to 20 mg/L (McCarthy and Ellery, 1998; McCarthy, 2006); there is negligible solute input from rainfall (Milzow et al, 2009). Silica is removed biogenically as diatom frustules and phytoliths, which accumulate in stream and pan sediments in the Okavango Delta and its outflows (McCarthy and Ellery, 1995; Ringrose et al, 2014 ; Struyf et al, 2015).…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high pH groundwater present in many parts of the Okavango system dissolves the diatom frustules and phytoliths in the upper layers of floodplain sediment (Ringrose et al, 2014; Struyf et al, 2015), because silica solubility increases greatly at pH > 9. As a result, this groundwater is silica‐rich.…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that Kalahari silcretes contain more Al than Cape silcretes even though their parent material has less (Table 1); this is probably because Al was retained by glauconite precipitation in the Kalahari silcretes, whilst no new Al‐bearing mineral formed in the Cape silcretes. Silicification of the Kalahari silcretes was driven by evaporation and periodic input of floodwater under an arid to semi‐arid climate; these processes are still occurring at the present day (McCarthy et al, 1991; McCarthy and Ellery, 1995; Ringrose et al, 2014). The crucial factor is that the evapotranspiration of groundwater in the Kalahari produces groundwater with a high pH that facilitates the mobility and precipitation of Si.…”
Section: Comparison Of Kalahari Desert and Cape Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the centre of the subcontinent, silcretes occur within Kalahari Group sediments, with outcrops described from the presently arid to semi‐arid Kalahari Desert (e.g. Summerfield, 1982, 1983c; Nash et al, 1994a; Nash et al, 1994b; Nash and Shaw, 1998; Shaw and Nash, 1998; Nash et al, 2004; Ringrose et al, 2005; Ringrose et al, 2009; Nash et al, 2013a; Ringrose et al, 2014; Nash et al, 2016) and the tropical southern Congo Basin (e.g. Veatch, 1935; Cahen and Lepersonne, 1952; Linol et al, 2015; Linol et al, 2019).…”
A synthesis of the geochemistry of silcretes and their host sediments in the Kalahari Desert and Cape coastal zone, using isocon comparisons, shows that silcretes in the two regions are very different. Kalahari Desert silcretes outcrop along drainage-lines and within pans, and formed by groundwater silicification of near-surface Kalahari Group sands. Silicification was approximately isovolumetric. Few elements were lost; silicon (Si) and potassium (K) were gained as microquartz precipitated in the sediment porosity and glauconite formed in the sub-oxic groundwater conditions. The low titanium (Ti) content reflects the composition of the host sands. Additional elements in the Kalahari Desert silcretes were supplied in river water and derived from weathering of silicates in basement rocks. Evaporation under an arid climate produced high-pH groundwater that mobilized and precipitated Si; this process is still occurring. In the Cape coastal zone, pedogenic silcretes cap hills and plateaus, overlying deeply weathered argillaceous bedrock. Silicification resulted from intensive weathering that destroyed the bedrock silicates, almost completely removing most elements and causing a substantial volume decrease. Some of the silica released formed a microcrystalline quartz matrix, and most Ti precipitated as anatase, so the Cape silcretes contain relatively high Ti levels. The intense weathering that formed the Cape silcretes could have occurred in the Eocene, during and after the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, when more acidic rainfall and high temperatures resulted in intensified silicate weathering worldwide. This could have been responsible for widespread formation of pedogenic silcretes elsewhere in Africa and around the globe. Trace element sourcing of silcrete artefacts to particular outcrops has most potential in the Cape, where differences between separate bedrock areas are reflected in the silcrete composition. In the Kalahari Desert, gains of some elements can override compositional differences of the parent material, and sourcing should be based on elements that show the least change during silicification.
“…Composition and mineralogy of host sediments in the Okavango system The mineralogy of the surface sediments across the entire area covered by the Kalahari Group is dominated by quartz, with small amounts of fine-grained calcite and dolomite, clays (kaolinite, illite, smectite) and feldspars (plagioclase, microcline and K-feldspar) (McCarthy et al, 1991;McCarthy and Ellery, 1995;Chatupa and Direng, 2000;Huntsman-Mapila et al, 2005;Ringrose et al, 2014). The heavy minerals present vary according to the mineralogy of (often deeply) underlying bedrock: zircon, ilmenite, tourmaline, staurolite, kyanite, epidote, zoisite, andalusite, apatite, brookite, rutile, sillimanite, sphene, amphibole and garnet (Moore and Dingle, 1998;Nuumbembe, 2016).…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Okavango River presently delivers an estimated 360 000 tonnes of solutes to the Okavango Delta per year, ~50% of which can be dissolved silica, with concentrations up to 20 mg/L (McCarthy and Ellery, 1998; McCarthy, 2006); there is negligible solute input from rainfall (Milzow et al, 2009). Silica is removed biogenically as diatom frustules and phytoliths, which accumulate in stream and pan sediments in the Okavango Delta and its outflows (McCarthy and Ellery, 1995; Ringrose et al, 2014 ; Struyf et al, 2015).…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high pH groundwater present in many parts of the Okavango system dissolves the diatom frustules and phytoliths in the upper layers of floodplain sediment (Ringrose et al, 2014; Struyf et al, 2015), because silica solubility increases greatly at pH > 9. As a result, this groundwater is silica‐rich.…”
Section: Kalahari Desert Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that Kalahari silcretes contain more Al than Cape silcretes even though their parent material has less (Table 1); this is probably because Al was retained by glauconite precipitation in the Kalahari silcretes, whilst no new Al‐bearing mineral formed in the Cape silcretes. Silicification of the Kalahari silcretes was driven by evaporation and periodic input of floodwater under an arid to semi‐arid climate; these processes are still occurring at the present day (McCarthy et al, 1991; McCarthy and Ellery, 1995; Ringrose et al, 2014). The crucial factor is that the evapotranspiration of groundwater in the Kalahari produces groundwater with a high pH that facilitates the mobility and precipitation of Si.…”
Section: Comparison Of Kalahari Desert and Cape Silcretesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the centre of the subcontinent, silcretes occur within Kalahari Group sediments, with outcrops described from the presently arid to semi‐arid Kalahari Desert (e.g. Summerfield, 1982, 1983c; Nash et al, 1994a; Nash et al, 1994b; Nash and Shaw, 1998; Shaw and Nash, 1998; Nash et al, 2004; Ringrose et al, 2005; Ringrose et al, 2009; Nash et al, 2013a; Ringrose et al, 2014; Nash et al, 2016) and the tropical southern Congo Basin (e.g. Veatch, 1935; Cahen and Lepersonne, 1952; Linol et al, 2015; Linol et al, 2019).…”
A synthesis of the geochemistry of silcretes and their host sediments in the Kalahari Desert and Cape coastal zone, using isocon comparisons, shows that silcretes in the two regions are very different. Kalahari Desert silcretes outcrop along drainage-lines and within pans, and formed by groundwater silicification of near-surface Kalahari Group sands. Silicification was approximately isovolumetric. Few elements were lost; silicon (Si) and potassium (K) were gained as microquartz precipitated in the sediment porosity and glauconite formed in the sub-oxic groundwater conditions. The low titanium (Ti) content reflects the composition of the host sands. Additional elements in the Kalahari Desert silcretes were supplied in river water and derived from weathering of silicates in basement rocks. Evaporation under an arid climate produced high-pH groundwater that mobilized and precipitated Si; this process is still occurring. In the Cape coastal zone, pedogenic silcretes cap hills and plateaus, overlying deeply weathered argillaceous bedrock. Silicification resulted from intensive weathering that destroyed the bedrock silicates, almost completely removing most elements and causing a substantial volume decrease. Some of the silica released formed a microcrystalline quartz matrix, and most Ti precipitated as anatase, so the Cape silcretes contain relatively high Ti levels. The intense weathering that formed the Cape silcretes could have occurred in the Eocene, during and after the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, when more acidic rainfall and high temperatures resulted in intensified silicate weathering worldwide. This could have been responsible for widespread formation of pedogenic silcretes elsewhere in Africa and around the globe. Trace element sourcing of silcrete artefacts to particular outcrops has most potential in the Cape, where differences between separate bedrock areas are reflected in the silcrete composition. In the Kalahari Desert, gains of some elements can override compositional differences of the parent material, and sourcing should be based on elements that show the least change during silicification.
Calcretes and silcretes are the most widely encountered 'rocks' in the Kalahari sandveld that covers much of Botswana. This chapter presents the first holistic overview of current knowledge about these duricrusts at a national scale. It does so by considering the distribution, classification, macromorphology, geochemistry and mineralogy of each duricrust type in turn, alongside various models used to explain their formation. The chapter then reviews our understanding of a variant of duricrust encountered more in the Botswana Kalahari than anywhere else in the worldthe silcrete-calcrete intergrade duricrust. The chapter concludes with a summary of knowledge about the age of duricrusts in Botswana before pointing to potential directions for future research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.