2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenetic characteristics of low permeability, non-reservoir chalks from the Central North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) are the main reservoir seals for the sub-Chalk reservoirs in the Central Graben, North Sea (Mallon & Swarbrick 2002Swarbrick et al 2010). These highly cemented and mechanically compacted Chalk units have the potential to seal high overpressure in the underlying highly pressured reservoirs (Mallon et al, 2005;Mallon & Swarbrick 2008;Swarbrick et al 2010). After the North Atlantic Ocean opened, the Eocene and younger Hordaland and Nordland groups, comprising up to 2500 m of predominantly siltstone and shale, were deposited.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) are the main reservoir seals for the sub-Chalk reservoirs in the Central Graben, North Sea (Mallon & Swarbrick 2002Swarbrick et al 2010). These highly cemented and mechanically compacted Chalk units have the potential to seal high overpressure in the underlying highly pressured reservoirs (Mallon et al, 2005;Mallon & Swarbrick 2008;Swarbrick et al 2010). After the North Atlantic Ocean opened, the Eocene and younger Hordaland and Nordland groups, comprising up to 2500 m of predominantly siltstone and shale, were deposited.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Mallon et al (2005Mallon et al ( , 2008 describe the deeply buried non-reservoir chalk as extensively cemented with fractional gross porosity from 0.04 to 0.18 (average 0.08), compared with 0.20-0.40 in the reservoir intervals at similar depths. The permeability of the reservoir chalk is in the milliDarcy to microDarcy range (10 215 -10 218 m 2 ), compared with nonreservoir chalk permeability in the nano-to microDarcy range (10 218 -10 221 m 2 ) depending on depth of burial.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Non-reservoir Chalkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interpretations feature a rapid increase of overpressure at the base of the Chalk and through the Lower Cretaceous and Upper Jurassic shales, where present (Holm 1998a, b). We re-assess the data in light of new permeability for the Chalk (Mallon et al 2005;Mallon & Swarbrick 2008) from rare direct pressure measurements plus gas data. A high-quality database of 1248 wells was made available by IHS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of the UK/Norwegian non‐reservoir samples included transmitted, cathodoluminescence (CL) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray diffraction, porosity, permeability analysis, mercury porosimetry and the quantification of the amount of insoluble residue within the sample (Mallon et al. 2005; Mallon & Swarbrick 2002b, in press) . Permeability measurements on this sample set were made using the TPD method. A total of 95 chalk core samples were sampled from four Danish offshore wells: [MFB‐7 (Dan Field); depth interval (2240–2440 m), Mona‐1 (3140–3440 m), West Lulu‐1 (2865–3690 m) and Svend T‐1 (2195–2347 m)] (Fig.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%