The Bunter Sandstone in the UK sector of the Southern North Sea Basin is a reservoir rock that is typically 200 m or more thick and has variable but commonly fair to good porosity and permeability. East of the Dowsing Fault Zone it is folded into a number of large periclines as a result of post-depositional halokinesis in the underlying Zechstein salt. It is sealed by the overlying Haisborough Group and younger fine-grained strata and is underlain by the Bunter Shale and Zechstein Group. As such it appears to be an attractive target for industrialscale CO 2 storage. However, the very large masses of CO 2 that would have to be injected and stored if CCS is to be an effective greenhouse gas mitigation option are likely to cause (a) significant pore fluid pressure rise and (b) displacement of formation brines from the reservoir. A series of reservoir flow simulations of large-scale CO 2 injection was carried out to investigate these effects. A simple, 3D geocellular model of the Bunter Sandstone in the NE part of the UK sector of the Southern North Sea was constructed in the Tough2 reservoir simulator in which porosity and both horizontal and vertical permeability could be varied. The injection of CO 2 at various rates into the model through a variable number of wells for 50 years was simulated and the model was then run forward for up to 3000 years to see how pore fluid pressures, brine displacement and CO 2 distribution evolved. The simulations suggest that provided there is good connectivity within the reservoir, and 12 optimally distributed injection locations are used, 15 -20 million tonnes of CO 2 per year could be stored in the modelled area without the reservoir pore pressure exceeding 75% of the lithostatic pressure anywhere within the model. However, significant fluxes of the native pore fluid (saline brine) to the sea occurred at a point where the Bunter Sandstone crops out at the seabed. This suggests that the potential environmental impacts of brine displacement to the sea floor should be investigated. The injected CO 2 fills only up to about 1% of the total pore space within the model. This indicates that pore fluid pressure rise may be a greater constraint on CO 2 storage capacity than physical containment within the storage reservoir.3
Fluid pressure in the pore system of sedimentary rocks is an important parameter to the exploration and production of petroleum. Compaction disequilibrium is considered by many by many workers to be the dominant pressure-generating mechanism. Clay mineral diagenesis (particularly the smectite to illite reaction) is recognized as a potential contributor to pore fluid pressure, but there have been few systematic studies which integrate clay reaction extent with pressure and log responses. This study examines samples from two basins with different shale mineralogy by detailed characterization of mudstone drill cuttings by X-ray diffraction, and compares these data with pore pressure information, bulk density and sonic velocity obtained from standard wireline well logging. Samples from Well A, with unreactive illite-smectite (I-S) yielded a single stress/density and single stress/velocity relationship. Unreactive I-S also yielded a simple velocity/density relationship where samples from a velocity reversal zone have the same sonic/density relationship as do samples from shallow zones in the well. Well B, with a reactive I-S suite, has complex stress/velocity, stress/density and velocity/density relationships. Open system illitization induced a more rapid velocity increase, relative to the rate of bulk density increase. Illitization with unloading induced velocity reduction while allowing bulk density to increase. The effect of illitization on density/stress relationships appears to be most dramatic during the latter stages of illitization. Introduction Recent studies on overpressure mechanisms have mostly emphasized the role of compaction disequilibrium as the most significant process in generating overpressure (e.g., Osborne and Swarbrick, 1997; Audet, 1995; Hart et al., 1995). The role of clay diagenesis as a pressure mechanism has been minimized and is considered to be to be only locally important. Some studies on clay diagenesis/pressure generation have emphasized the possible volume change associated with the clay reaction (Osborne and Swarbrick, 1997). More recent work by Lahann (1998, 2001) suggests that the primary role that clay diagenesis plays is to change the compaction response of the shale. In this model, the clayderived water released from hydrated interlayer cations in expandable mixed-layer illite-smectite (I-S) during the illitization reaction is a secondary pressure source and the change in the water volume is neglected. In addition to the role of the illitization reaction in fluid pressure generation, the effect of illitization on the petrophysical properties of shales and mudstones is poorly understood. Deeply buried shales from the Gulf of Mexico shelf, which presumably have undergone illitization, often slow sonic velocities (for their density) relative to shales with a higher smectite layer content (expandability) in the I-S. However, since illitized zones are often overpressured, it is difficult to separate a possible change (relative sonic slowing) due to illitization, from a slowing associated with unloading (Bowers, 1994; Bowers, 1998). The objective of this study is to integrate detailed mixedlayer clay mineral characterization information with wireline log and pressure data. Two wells are examined which exhibit distinctly different mineralogical profiles and which have different depth trends for sonic velocity and bulk density.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.