2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenesis, not biogenesis: Two late Roman skeletal examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the Medieval diet was mixed and balanced with a predominance of plant foods compared to the diet rich in animal protein of the Copper Age (Bartoli & Bacci 2009). These lead concentrations are, however, lower than those found in Roman samples, a period when exposure to lead was high (Zapata et al, 2006;Aufderheide et al, 1992;Lewis, 1995) and are similar to those determined in the contemporary human population (Becker et al, 1968;Busetto et al, 2008;Miculescu et al, 2011). …”
Section: Comparison Of Epochssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, the Medieval diet was mixed and balanced with a predominance of plant foods compared to the diet rich in animal protein of the Copper Age (Bartoli & Bacci 2009). These lead concentrations are, however, lower than those found in Roman samples, a period when exposure to lead was high (Zapata et al, 2006;Aufderheide et al, 1992;Lewis, 1995) and are similar to those determined in the contemporary human population (Becker et al, 1968;Busetto et al, 2008;Miculescu et al, 2011). …”
Section: Comparison Of Epochssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Besides, the values are higher than the range of ratios that were proposed by Zapata et al (2006) as thresholds of significant diagenetic process (2.30 to 2.50). Based on the comparisons, it can be concluded that the studied bone samples, in general, have been subjected to significant postmortem alterations.…”
Section: Discussion Diagenesis Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…No obstante, se analizó también la matriz terrosa y como se observa en la Tabla 4 dichos metales también se encontraron en el sustrato, por lo que probablemente parte de los elementos registrados en los huesos proviniesen de una contaminación externa durante la diagénesis. Sin embargo, no se podía desechar la idea de que hubiera algún tipo de contaminación en vida del asno porque no se podían discriminar cuáles eran los elementos intrusivos ni qué cantidades provenían de la diagénesis (Carvalho & Marques, 2008;Carvalho et al, 2004;Patterson et al, 1991;Rebôcho et al, 2006;Zapata et al, 2006). Posteriormente se limpiaron utilizando el procedimiento descrito anteriormente, acetona y ácido acético, y los resultados de PIXE en la parte interna (T3 y F7) no mostraron trazas de Si, Mg, Al, K, Ti, Cr, Mn ni Pb, contrariamente a los resultados de los análisis realizados en las muestras que sólo fueron cepilladas (Tabla 4).…”
Section: ¿Se Podría Hablar De Bioacumulación En Los Huesos Del Asno?unclassified