2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13065-016-0216-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT and TD-DFT calculation of new thienopyrazine-based small molecules for organic solar cells

Abstract: BackgroundNovel six organic donor-π-acceptor molecules (D-π-A) used for Bulk Heterojunction organic solar cells (BHJ), based on thienopyrazine were studied by density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) approaches, to shed light on how the π-conjugation order influence the performance of the solar cells. The electron acceptor group was 2-cyanoacrylic for all compounds, whereas the electron donor unit was varied and the influence was investigated.MethodsThe TD-DFT method, combined with a hyb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in order to identify the functional most suited to simulate all spectroscopies of interest, preliminary benchmarks based on both the OPA and ECD spectra were performed. A subset of functionals known to provide reliable results on similar system was chosen, namely CAM-B3LYP (Yanai et al, 2004 ), LC-ωPBE (Vydrov and Scuseria, 2006 ), M06-2X (Valero et al, 2008 ), MN15 (Haoyu et al, 2016 ), PBE0 (Adamo and Barone, 1999 ), and ωB97X-D (Chai and Head-Gordon, 2008 ). For CAM-B3LYP and PBE0, the D3 formulation of the empirical dispersion correction proposed by Grimme et al ( 2010 ), in conjunction with the Becke-Johnson (BJ) damping (Grimme et al, 2011 ) were used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to identify the functional most suited to simulate all spectroscopies of interest, preliminary benchmarks based on both the OPA and ECD spectra were performed. A subset of functionals known to provide reliable results on similar system was chosen, namely CAM-B3LYP (Yanai et al, 2004 ), LC-ωPBE (Vydrov and Scuseria, 2006 ), M06-2X (Valero et al, 2008 ), MN15 (Haoyu et al, 2016 ), PBE0 (Adamo and Barone, 1999 ), and ωB97X-D (Chai and Head-Gordon, 2008 ). For CAM-B3LYP and PBE0, the D3 formulation of the empirical dispersion correction proposed by Grimme et al ( 2010 ), in conjunction with the Becke-Johnson (BJ) damping (Grimme et al, 2011 ) were used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, we extracted 30 snapshots sequentially from the trajectory, from each snapshot we cut a sphere of 30 Å centered around the solute and we assembled them into a collective configuration and we assigned to each environmental atom 1/30 of the actual atomic charge. The first 11 electronic states and the complete matrix of the corresponding dipole moments were computed for the 4 reference configurations exploiting the ONIOM/EE model with the QM part described at the TD-DFT/CAM-B3LYP (Yanai et al, 2004 ) level in conjunction with the jul-cc-pVDZ (Dunning, 1989 ; Papajak et al, 2011 ) basis set. For each electronic state, the corresponding atomic charges were also computed at the same computational level using the CM5 recipe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we employed six popular exchange-correlation functionals on the molecule CTRZ which has been well-characterized experimentally in previous works (An et al, 2011 ; Duan et al, 2018 ) as well as in this work. We used two range-separated hybrid functionals, CAM-B3LYP (Yanai et al, 2004 ) and ωB97XD (Chai and Head-Gordon, 2008 ), three hybrid meta-GGA functionals, M06-2X (56% exact exchange), M06-HF (100 % exact exchange) (Zhao and Truhlar, 2008 ) and PW6B95D3(28% exact exchange) (Zhao and Truhlar, 2005 ) and a meta-GGA functional, PBE0(25% exact exchange) (Adamo and Barone, 1999 ). Table 1 compares the calculated S 1 and T 1 emission energies, in the relaxed excited state geometry, obtained for CTRZ with these 6 functionals with the experimentally measured value (see next section).…”
Section: Td-dft-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%