2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2007.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT and CCSD(T) study of the disilicon trihydride (Si2H3) isomerization, unprecedented isomeric structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table S2 in the Supporting Information shows that the theoretical and experimental frequencies and rotational constants of SiH 4 agrees within 2%. For the H 2 SiSiH and the H 3 SiSi isomers, our structural parameters are very consistent with previous theoretical predictions [45,47]. n/i-Si 3 H 7 Decomposition.…”
Section: Sih 4 + H 2 Sisih/sisih 3 Association Each Reactionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table S2 in the Supporting Information shows that the theoretical and experimental frequencies and rotational constants of SiH 4 agrees within 2%. For the H 2 SiSiH and the H 3 SiSi isomers, our structural parameters are very consistent with previous theoretical predictions [45,47]. n/i-Si 3 H 7 Decomposition.…”
Section: Sih 4 + H 2 Sisih/sisih 3 Association Each Reactionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a previous study , although the H 2 SiSiH isomer was reported to have a higher energy of 5.5 kcal/mol than the SiSiH 3 isomer at the self‐consistent field (SCF) level, but at higher levels of theory considering full triples, with relativistic and ZVPE corrections, the H 2 SiSiH isomer was found to be more stable than the SiSiH 3 isomer. Choukri et al also showed that the former is lower in energy by 0.04–0.67 kcal/mol than the latter. In our study at the CCSD(T)/CBS//B3LYP/6–311++G(3df,2p) level, we found that the H 2 SiSiH isomer is 0.5 kcal/mol more stable than the SiSiH 3 isomer, in good agreement with the recent literature value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among the six Si 2 H 3 isomers ( 25 – 30 ), silylsilylidyne (H 3 SiSi; 26 ; X 2 A), vinyl-type disilenyl (H 2 SiSiH; 27 ; X 2 A), and one monobridged isomer Si­(H)­SiH 2 ( 25 ; X 2 A″) are nearly isoenergetic. The hydrogen atoms of disilenyl are slightly bent out-of-plane, and thus there is no symmetry at all; this reflects the diverse chemistry of silicon versus carbon and germanium. Considering the unusual silicon and germanium bearing mono- and dibridged HGe­(μ-H)­SiH ( 13 ; X 2 A), Ge­(μ-H 2 )­SiH ( 15 ; X 2 A′), HGe­(μ-H)­SiH ( 16 ; X 2 A), HGe­(μ-H 2 )Si ( 18 ; X 2 A′), H 2 Ge­(μ-H)­Ge ( 21 ; X 2 A″), HGe­(μ-H)­GeH ( 22 ; X 2 A), HGe­(μ-H 2 )Ge ( 23 ; X 2 A′), HGe­(μ-H)­GeH ( 24 ; X 2 A), H 2 Si­(μ-H)Si ( 25 ; X 2 A″), HSi­(μ-H)­SiH ( 28 ; X 2 A), HSi­(μ-H)­SiH ( 29 ; X 2 A), and HSi­(μ-H 2 )Si ( 30 ; X 2 A′) isomers, whose carbon analogue structures do not exist, the special molecular structure and chemical bonding of heavy main group XIV elements are also reflected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%